Journal Home
Search for

Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 422-427 (May 2010)


View previous. 6 of 53 View next.

Utility of Initial Bolus Insulin in the Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Nikhil Goyal, MDCorresponding Author Information, Joseph B. Miller, MD, Steadman S. Sankey, PHD, Usamah Mossallam, MD

Received 26 January 2007; received in revised form 27 May 2007; accepted 2 November 2007. published online 03 June 2008.

Abstract 

Current guidelines for treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) recommend administration of an intravenous bolus dose of insulin followed by a continuous infusion. This study was designed to investigate whether the initial bolus dose is of significant benefit to adult patients with DKA and if it is associated with increased complications. This was a non-concurrent, prospective observational cohort study of adult patients who presented with DKA in a 12-month period. Charts were divided into two groups depending on whether they received an initial bolus dose of insulin. Data on glucose levels, anion gap (AG), intravenous fluid administration (IVF), and length of stay (LOS) were collected. Primary outcome was hypoglycemia (need for administration of 50% dextrose). Of 157 charts, 78 received a bolus of insulin and were designated the treatment group, the remaining 79 formed the control group. Groups were similar at baseline and received equivalent IVF and insulin drips. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of hypoglycemia (6% vs. 1%, respectively, p = 0.12), rate of change of glucose (60 vs. 56 mg/dL/h, respectively, p = 0.54) or AG (1.9 vs. 1.9 mEq/L/h, respectively, p = 0.66), LOS in the Emergency Department (8 vs. 7 h, respectively, p = 0.37) or hospital (5.6 vs. 5.9 days, p = 0.81). Equivalence testing revealed no clinically relevant differences in IVF change, rate of change of glucose, or AG. Administration of an initial bolus dose of insulin was not associated with significant benefit to patients with DKA and demonstrated equivalent changes in clinically relevant endpoints when compared to patients not administered the bolus.

 Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan

 Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan

 Department of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan

Corresponding Author InformationReprint Address: Nikhil Goyal, md, Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, CFP-2, Detroit, MI 48202

PII: S0736-4679(08)00042-5

doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.11.033


View previous. 6 of 53 View next.