The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 2 , Pages 175-181, February 2010

The Impact of Rapid Sequence Intubation on Trauma Patient Mortality in Attempted Prehospital Intubation

Presented in abstract form at the 2007 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, May 2007 and at the SAEM Western Regional Research Forum, Portland, Oregon, March 2007.

  • Michael T. Cudnik, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint Address: Michael T. Cudnik, md, mph, 146 Means Hall, 1654 Upham Drive, Columbus, OH 43210
  • ,
  • Craig D. Newgard, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
  • ,
  • Mohamud Daya, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
  • ,
  • Jonathan Jui, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon

Received 24 September 2007; received in revised form 10 December 2007; accepted 27 January 2008. published online 15 September 2008.

Abstract 

Background: Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) has been instituted in some prehospital settings to improve the success of endotracheal intubation (ETI); whether RSI improves outcomes is unclear. Objectives: We sought to determine if trauma patients intubated with RSI in the prehospital setting had better survival compared to those intubated without RSI. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis. We analyzed all injured adults (aged ≥ 15 years) meeting state trauma system criteria, having a prehospital ETI attempt, and transported from the scene (19 counties) to one of the two state Level 1 trauma centers from 2000–2005. To adjust for the non-random selection of patients for field RSI, we built a propensity score from 15 important confounders, including demographics, injury severity, blood transfusion, surgical procedures, comorbidities, alcohol use, transport mode, injury mechanism, and initial field physiologic values. A propensity-adjusted multivariable logistic regression model (outcome = in-hospital mortality), with a time-based variable for system-wide implementation of changes in airway management, was used to test the association between RSI-ETI and mortality. Results: There were 877 consecutive trauma patients who had prehospital ETI during this period and were included in the analysis. Of these, 496 (57%) had RSI-ETI. In univariate analyses, those with RSI-ETI had less severe injuries, better prehospital physiology (i.e., higher Glasgow Coma Scale score and blood pressure), fewer operations, fewer blood transfusions, and lower unadjusted mortality than those intubated without RSI. However, in the propensity-adjusted model, there was no statistical difference in mortality between the two groups (odds ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.52–1.06). Conclusions: Patients selected for RSI-ETI were less seriously injured, with better prognostic factors than intubated patients for whom RSI was not used. After adjusting for these differences, use of prehospital RSI-ETI was not associated with improved survival.

Keywords: Emergency Medical Services, trauma, intubation, mortality

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by a Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Institutional Research Training Grant and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Resuscitation Outcomes Training Grant 1 U01 HL 077873-01.

PII: S0736-4679(08)00319-3

doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.01.022

The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 2 , Pages 175-181, February 2010