The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 40, Issue 5 , Pages 534-538, May 2011

Are Live Instructors Replaceable? Computer vs. Classroom Lectures for EFAST Training

  • Elke Platz, MD, RDMS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint Address: Elke Platz, md, rdms, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Neville House, Boston, MA 02115
  • ,
  • Andrew Liteplo, MD, RDMS

      Affiliations

    • Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Shelley Hurwitz, PHD

      Affiliations

    • Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • James Hwang, MD, RDMS, RDCS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Received 4 April 2009; received in revised form 14 August 2009; accepted 30 August 2009. published online 06 November 2009.

Abstract 

Background: The EFAST (extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma) is part of the recommended curriculum for Emergency Medicine and Surgery residents. Computer-based lectures may represent a time-efficient alternative to traditional lectures. Objectives: Our hypothesis was that computer lectures in basic ultrasound and the EFAST are not inferior to classroom lectures in test score improvement for residents with or without prior training. Methods: First-year Emergency Medicine and Surgery residents were enrolled and completed a pre-test. Subjects were then randomized into a classroom group, which attended traditional lectures, and a computer group, which listened to narrated lectures on computers. After the didactic training, all subjects completed a post-test. Results: Forty-four subjects completed the study: 64% were General Surgery residents, 66% were male. Overall, mean test score improvements were higher in the classroom than in the computer group (28.0% vs. 18.4%). In 25 residents without prior training, mean improvements in the computer and classroom groups were 25% and 27%, respectively. The 95% confidence limit around the difference was 9%, falling within the a priori non-inferiority range of 10%, and consistent with non-inferiority of computer-based lectures. In 19 residents with prior training, mean test score improvements for the computer and classroom groups were 13% and 29%, respectively. The 95% confidence limit of 24% exceeded the non-inferiority range, consistent with inferiority of computer-based lectures. Conclusions: Computer-based lectures are not inferior to classroom lectures and may represent a worthwhile substitution in subjects without prior ultrasound education. Our data suggest that didactic ultrasound training through classroom lectures is more effective than computer-based lectures in individuals with prior training.

Keywords: emergency ultrasound, EFAST, education, e-learning, blended learning

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was generously supported by two faculty seed grants from the Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

PII: S0736-4679(09)00755-0

doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.08.030

The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 40, Issue 5 , Pages 534-538, May 2011