The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 40, Issue 5 , Pages 565-579, May 2011

Violence in the Emergency Department: A National Survey of Emergency Medicine Residents and Attending Physicians

Presented at the American College of Emergency Physicians Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, October 2008.

  • Marcelina Behnam, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
  • ,
  • Roger D. Tillotson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
  • ,
  • Stephen M. Davis, MPA, MSW

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding Address: Stephen M. Davis, mpa, msw, Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, PO Box 9149, Morgantown, WV 26506
  • ,
  • Gerald R. Hobbs, PHD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
    • Department of Statistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia

Received 2 June 2009; received in revised form 3 November 2009; accepted 10 November 2009. published online 05 February 2010.

Abstract 

Background: Violence in the Emergency Department (ED) is a well-known phenomenon. Few studies have been done to assess the incidence and nature of violence in the ED. Study Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of violence in the ED nationwide. Methods: This study was a prospective, cross-sectional online survey of Emergency Medicine (EM) residents and attending physicians. Of the 134 accredited United States (US) EM residency programs, 65 programs were randomly selected and invited to participate. Results: Overall, 272 surveys were returned, of which 263 (97%) were completed and further analyzed. At least one workplace violence act in the previous 12 months was reported by 78% (95% confidence interval 73–83%) of respondents, with 21% reporting more than one type of violent act. Workplace violence was experienced similarly between males and females (79% vs. 75%, respectively; p = 0.65), and was more common in EDs with annual volumes over 60,000 patients (82% vs. 67%; p = 0.01). The most common type of workplace violence was verbal threats (75%) followed by physical assaults (21%), confrontations outside the workplace (5%), and stalking (2%). Security was available full time in most settings (98%), but was least likely to be physically present in patient care areas. The majority of respondent EDs did not screen for weapons (40% screened) or have metal detectors (38% had metal detectors). Only 16% of programs provided violence workshops, and less than 10% offered self-defense training. Conclusion: Despite the high incidence of workplace violence experienced by the emergency physicians who responded to our survey, less than half of these respondents worked in EDs that screened for weapons or had metal detectors. An even smaller number of physicians worked in settings that provided violence workshops or self-defense training.

Keywords: emergency medicine, violence, physician wellness

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by the West Virginia University Emergency Medicine Research Grant.

PII: S0736-4679(09)00910-X

doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.11.007

The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 40, Issue 5 , Pages 565-579, May 2011