The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 41, Issue 3 , Pages 317-323, September 2011

Introduction of the Conducted Electrical Weapon into a Hospital Setting

  • Jeffrey D. Ho, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint Address: Jeffrey D. Ho, md, Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, 701 Park Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55415
  • ,
  • Joseph E. Clinton, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Mark A. Lappe, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Security, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • William G. Heegaard, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Martin F. Williams, MA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Security, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • James R. Miner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Received 29 June 2009; received in revised form 14 September 2009; accepted 28 September 2009. published online 01 February 2010.

Abstract 

Background: The TASER® X26 Conducted Electrical Weapon (CEW) provides painful stimuli and neuromuscular incapacitation to potentially violent persons. Use by law enforcement in society is common. Presenting a CEW is known to de-escalate some situations. Health care personnel sometimes encounter violent persons within the confines of the hospital. CEW use by health care security personnel has not been described. Objective: The objective is to describe results from the introduction of the CEW into a hospital environment. Methods: Upon introducing the CEW into an urban hospital campus, standardized reports were made describing all CEW use by hospital security. Reports were retrospectively reviewed for the first 12 months of CEW use. Collected data included force options used, potential injuries avoided, witness comments, outcomes, and whether the CEW required full activation or if inactive presentation was sufficient to control the situation. Rates of security personnel injuries were also gathered. Descriptive analysis was applied. Results: Twenty-seven CEW deployments occurred: four were inactive presentation, 20 were presentation with LASER sight activation, and three were probe deployments with a 5-s delivery of electrical current. Two persons required evaluation for minor injuries not related to CEW use. Witnesses reported that in all incidents, injuries were likely avoided due to CEW presentation or use. CEW use aborted one suicide attempt. Personnel injury rates decreased during the study period. Conclusion: CEW introduction into a health care setting demonstrated the ability to avert and control situations that could result in further injury to subjects, patients, and personnel. This correlates with a decrease in injury for hospital personnel. Further study is recommended for validation.

Keywords: TASER, conducted electrical weapon, electronic control device, hospital security, patient safety, violence, injury prevention

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr. Ho serves as an independent expert medical consultant to TASER International, Inc. and owns shares of stock in the company. Dr. Heegaard serves as a member of the TASER International Scientific Medical Advisory Board. The remaining authors have no conflicts to declare.

PII: S0736-4679(09)00929-9

doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.09.031

The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 41, Issue 3 , Pages 317-323, September 2011