Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 2, ISSUE 6, P421-427, 1985

The field instructor program: quality control of prehospital care, the first step

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Orientation and evaluation of the new paramedic employee are areas that are frequently overlooked or not performed in a consistent manner. In order to evaluate skills of new employees in a standardized fashion and provide a formal structured orientation, the field instructor program was instituted. Since 1978, 78 people have gone through the program. Sixty-nine (88.5%) successfully completed the course. All of those released in “poor standing” were subsequently dismissed from the paramedic division because of poor medical performance. This program has provided orientation of new paramedics and identified those with serious deficiencies in their practice.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Small R.D.
        • Hackworth C.
        • Pulford J.F.
        Quality control.
        J Emerg Med Serv. 1984; 9: 67-71
        • DeFors J.H.
        Evaluating practical skills.
        J Emerg Med Serv. 1984; 9: 36-38
        • Gille G.
        Training 1985, Topics, trends, teachers, and trainees.
        Emergency. 1985; 17: 40-42
        • Athey S.L.
        Employ the best. A guide to paramedic selection.
        J Emerg Med Serv. 1983; 8: 45-47
        • Shade B.
        In-house education.
        Emergency. 1984; 15: 33-35