Advertisement
Original contribution| Volume 14, ISSUE 4, P413-418, July 1996

A comparison of three gastric lavage methods using the radionuclide gastric emptying study

  • Mahesh Shrestha
    Correspondence
    Reprint Address: Mahesh Shrestha, md, Division of Emergency Medicine, U. T. Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-8579.
    Affiliations
    Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA

    Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA

    North Texas Poison Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jacob George
    Affiliations
    Nuclear Medicine Department, Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Michael J. Chiu
    Affiliations
    Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • William A. Erdman
    Affiliations
    Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA

    Nuclear Medicine Department, Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • James E. Hayes
    Affiliations
    Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      To determine the percentage of liquid gastric contents experimentally removable by available orogastric lavage systems, five healthy young volunteers were asked to ingest 1 mCi of liquid technicium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Tc99m-DTPA) mixed with 50 ml tap water. Five minutes afterwards, the radionuclide was lavaged using one of three different techniques—a single syringe method, a closed gravity drainage system, and a closed double syringe method—while continuous radioisotope camera images were taken. Control images, with no lavage performed, were also taken. All of the orogastric lavage methods removed a mean of between 80% and 85% of the stomach contents. The double syringe method was the quickest, while the single syringe method was least tolerated. When compared with control, none of the lavage techniques pushed gastric contents into the duodenum. Thus, in terms of amount of liquid gastric contents removed, there was no one method that removed more than the others. Caution should be exercised in assuming that 80–85% of a liquid gastric ingestion can be removed by lavage in the uncontolled clinical setting. The use of any orogastric lavage for ingestion evacuation should be undertaken knowing that it is a morbid procedure and usually not necessary.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Smilkstein MJ
        • Price D
        • Flomenbaum NE
        Gastrointestinal principles.
        in: Goldfrank LR Flomenbaum NE Lewin NA Toxicologic emergencies. ed 4. Appelton & Lange, Norwalk, Connecticut/San Mateo, California1990: 119-133
        • Jawary D
        • Cameron PA
        • Dziukas L
        • et al.
        Drug overdose— reducing the load.
        Med J Aust. 1993; 156: 343-346
        • Kulig K
        • Bar-Or D
        • Cantrill SV
        • et al.
        Manangement of acutely poisoned patients without gastric emptying.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1985; 14: 562-567
        • Merigan KS
        • Woodard M
        • Hedges JR
        • et al.
        Prospective evaluation of gastric emptying in the self-poisoned patient.
        Am J Emerg Med. 1990; 8: 479-483
        • Horowitz M
        • Cook DJ
        • Collins PJ
        The application of techniques using radionuclides to the study of gastric emptying.
        Surg Gyne Obst. 1982; 155: 692-698
        • Horowitz M
        • Akkermans LMA
        Scintigraphic measurement of gastric emptying.
        in: Read NW Gastrointestinal motility: which test? Wrightson Biomedical Publishing Ltd, Petersfield1989: 73-89
        • Auerbach P
        • Osterloh J
        • Braun O
        • et al.
        Efficacy of gastric emptying: gastric lavage vs. emesis induced by ipecac.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1986; 15: 692-698
        • Tandberg D
        • Diven BG
        • McLead JW
        Efficacy of ipecac-induced emesis vs. gastric lavage: a controlled study in normal adults.
        Am J Emerg Med. 1986; 4: 205-209
        • Young WF
        • Bivins HG
        Evaluation of gastric emptying using radionuclides: gastric lavage vs. ipecac-induced emesis.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1993; 22: 1423-1427
        • Rudolph JP
        Automated gastric lavage and a comparison of .9% normal saline solution and tap water irrigant.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1985; 14: 1156-1159
        • Horowitz M
        • Collins PJ
        • Shearman DJC
        Disorders of gastric emptying in humans and the use of radionuclide techniques.
        Arch Int Med. 1985; 145: 1467-1472
        • Minami H
        • McCallum RW
        The physiology and pathophysiology of gastric emptying in humans.
        Gastroenteroly. 1984; 86: 1592-1610
        • Saetta JP
        • Marsh S
        • Quinton DN
        Gastric-emptying procedures in the self-poisoned patient: are we forcing gastric content beyond the pylorus?.
        J R Soc Med. 1991; 84: 274-276
        • Tanenbein M
        • Cohen S
        • Sitar DS
        Efficacy of ipecac-induced emesis, orogastric lavage, and activated charcoal for acute drug overdose.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1987; 16: 838-841
        • Danel V
        • Henry JA
        • Glucksman E
        Activated charcoal, emesis, and gastric lavage in aspirin overdose.
        BMJ. 1988; 296: 1507
        • Saetta JP
        • Quinton DN
        Residual gastric content after gastric lavage and ipecacuanha-induced emesis in self-poisoned patients: an endoscopic study.
        J R Soc Med. 1991; 84: 35-38