Evaluation of Trauma Care Applying TRISS Methodology in a Caribbean Developing Country


      There have been conflicting reports regarding the applicability of Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) methodology to evaluate trauma care in a developing country setting. The objective of this study was to apply TRISS methodology to evaluate trauma care in the public hospitals of a Caribbean developing country. A prospective, observational study was conducted in the three major general hospitals in Trinidad. Major trauma patients were included. Demographic data, waiting time in the Emergency Department, and nature of injury (blunt or penetrating) were noted. Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, and Glasgow Coma Scale were applied to all patients on admission. Hospital outcomes were noted. Predicted outcomes were calculated for adult patients using TRISS methodology. M, Z statistics and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were done. There were 326 trauma patients studied, of whom 279 adults were evaluated by the TRISS methodology. Men were more frequently involved in trauma than women; there was more blunt trauma than penetrating trauma. The M statistic was 0.98 and the overall Z statistic was 5.81. The ROC curve analysis showed TRISS to be a fair discriminator in the study case-mix with an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.69–0.96). There is a considerable disparity between predicted and observed outcomes when trauma patients are evaluated by the TRISS methodology in a developing country setting.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment


        • Kochanek K.D.
        • Murphy S.C.
        • Anderson R.N.
        • Scott C.
        Deaths: final data for 2002.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2004; 53: 1-115
      1. Trauma Audit & Research Network.
        (Accessed March 2006)
      2. Country health profile: Trinidad and Tobago.
        (Accessed March 2006)
        • Champion H.R.
        • Sacco W.J.
        • Copes W.S.
        • Gann D.S.
        • Gennarelli T.A.
        • Flanagan M.E.
        A revision of the Trauma Score.
        J Trauma. 1989; 29: 623-629
        • Greenspan L.
        • McLellan B.A.
        • Greig H.
        Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score: a scoring chart.
        J Trauma. 1985; 25: 60-64
        • Wong D.T.
        • Barrow P.M.
        • Gomez M.
        • McGuire G.P.
        A comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score and the Trauma-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for outcome assessment in intensive care unit trauma patients.
        Crit Care Med. 1996; 24: 1642-1648
        • Schall L.C.
        • Potoka D.A.
        • Ford H.R.
        A new method for estimating probability of survival in pediatric patients using revised TRISS methodology based on age-adjusted weights.
        J Trauma. 2002; 52: 235-241
        • Osler T.M.
        • Rogers F.B.
        • Badger G.J.
        • Healey M.
        • Vane D.W.
        • Shackford S.R.
        A simple mathematical modification of TRISS markedly improves calibration.
        J Trauma. 2002; 53: 630-634
        • Ali J.
        • Adam R.
        • Chang H.
        • et al.
        Trauma outcome improves following the Advanced Trauma Life Support Program in a developing country.
        J Trauma. 1993; 34: 898-899
        • Ali J.
        • Adam R.
        • Gana T.
        • Williams J.
        Trauma patient after the Prehospital Trauma Life Support program.
        J Trauma. 1997; 42: 1018-1022
        • Ali J.
        • Adam R.
        • Stedman M.
        • Howard M.
        • Williams J.I.
        Advanced Trauma Life Support Program increases emergency room application of trauma resuscitative procedures in a developing country.
        J Trauma. 1994; 36: 391-394
        • Ali J.
        • Adam R.U.
        • Gana T.J.
        • et al.
        Impact of the Prehospital Trauma Life Support Programme in Trinidad and Tobago.
        West Indian Med J. 1998; 47: 102-104
        • McDonald A.
        • Ali J.
        • Mitchell D.I.
        • et al.
        A potential role for Advanced Trauma Life Support Programme in improving trauma care in Jamaica.
        West Indian Med J. 2003; 52: 208-212
      3. Available at: Accessed March 2006.

        • Boyd C.R.
        • Tolson M.A.
        • Copes W.S.
        Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method.
        J Trauma. 1987; 27: 370-378
        • Champion H.R.
        • Copes W.S.
        • Sacco W.J.
        • et al.
        The Major Trauma Outcome Study—establishing norms for trauma care.
        J Trauma. 1990; 30: 1356-1365
        • Joosse P.
        • Soedarmo S.
        • Luitse J.S.
        • Ponsen K.J.
        Trauma outcome analysis of a Jakarta University Hospital using the TRISS method: validation and limitation in comparison with the major trauma outcome study.
        J Trauma. 2001; 51: 134-140
        • Murlidhar V.
        • Roy N.
        Measuring trauma outcomes in India an analysis based on TRISS methodology in a Mumbai University Hospital.
        Injury. 2004; 35: 386-390
        • Zafar H.
        • Rehmani R.
        • Raja A.J.
        • Ali A.
        • Ahmed M.
        Registry based trauma outcome: perspective of a developing country.
        Emerg Med J. 2002; 19: 391-394
        • Demetriades D.
        • Berne T.V.
        • Belzberg H.
        • et al.
        The impact of a dedicated trauma program on outcome in severely injured patients.
        Arch Surg. 1995; 130: 216-220
        • Lane P.L.
        • Doig G.
        • Mikrogianakis A.
        • Charyk Stewart T.
        • Stefanits T.
        An evaluation of Ontario trauma outcomes and the development of regional norms for Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) analysis.
        J Trauma. 1996; 41: 731-734
        • Thanapaisal C.
        • Wongkonkitsin N.
        • Seow O.T.
        • et al.
        Outcome of in-patient trauma cases: Accident and Emergency Unit, Khon Kaen University.
        J Med Assoc Thai. 2005; 88: 1540-1544
        • Scarpelini S.
        • de Andrade J.I.
        • Dinis Costa Passos A.
        The TRISS method applied to the victims of traffic accidents attended at a tertiary level emergency hospital in a developing country.
        Injury. 2006; 37: 72-77
        • Podang J.
        • Singhasivanon P.
        • Podhipak A.
        • Santikarn C.
        • Sarol Jr, J.N.
        • Ancheta C.A.
        Primary verification: is the TRISS appropriate for Thailand?.
        Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004; 35: 188-194
        • Gillot A.R.
        • Copes W.S.
        • Langan E.
        • Najarian M.
        • Wiseman J.
        • Sacco W.J.
        TRISS unexpected survivors—a statistical phenomenon or a clinical reality?.
        J Trauma. 1992; 33: 743-748
        • Demetriades D.
        • Chan L.S.
        • Velmahos G.
        • et al.
        TRISS methodology in trauma: the need for alternatives.
        Br J Surg. 1998; 85: 379-384
        • Hariharan S.
        • Zbar A.
        Risk scoring and prediction of outcomes in perioperative and surgical intensive care patients—a review.
        Curr Surg. 2006; 63: 226-236
        • Norris R.
        • Woods R.
        • Harbrecht B.
        • et al.
        TRISS unexpected survivors: an outdated standard.
        J Trauma. 2002; 52: 229-234
        • Champion H.R.
        • Copes W.S.
        • Sacco W.J.
        • et al.
        A new characterization of injury severity.
        J Trauma. 1990; 30: 539-545
        • Champion H.R.
        • Copes W.S.
        • Sacco W.J.
        • et al.
        Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation.
        J Trauma. 1996; 41: 573-574
        • Kaufmann C.R.
        • Maier R.V.
        • Kaufmann E.J.
        • Rivara F.P.
        • Carrico C.J.
        Validity of applying adult TRISS analysis to injured children.
        J Trauma. 1991; 31: 691-697
        • Orliaguet G.
        • Meyer P.
        • Blanot S.
        • et al.
        Validity of applying TRISS analysis to paediatric blunt trauma patients managed in a French paediatric level I trauma centre.
        Intensive Care Med. 2001; 27: 743-750
        • Fallon Jr, W.F.
        • Barnoski A.L.
        • Mancuso C.L.
        • Tinnell C.A.
        • Malangoni M.A.
        Benchmarking the quality-monitoring process: a comparison of outcomes analysis by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) methodology with the peer-review process.
        J Trauma. 1997; 42: 810-815
        • Demetriades D.
        • Chan L.
        • Velmahos G.V.
        • et al.
        TRISS methodology: an inappropriate tool for comparing outcomes between trauma centers.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2001; 193: 250-254
        • Rutledge R.
        • Osler T.
        • Emery S.
        • Kromhout-Schiro S.
        The end of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): ICISS, an International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision-based prediction tool, outperforms both ISS and TRISS as predictors of trauma patient survival, hospital charges, and hospital length of stay.
        J Trauma. 1998; 44: 41-49