Advertisement

Emergency Medicine Interest Group Curriculum: Faculty and Preclinical Student Opinions Differ in a Formal Needs Assessment

  • Carol Lee
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sebastian Uijtdehaage
    Affiliations
    Center for Educational Development and Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
    Search for articles by this author
  • Wendy C. Coates
    Correspondence
    Reprint Address: Wendy C. Coates, md, Department of Emergency Medicine, Box 21, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson St. Torrance, CA 90509-2910
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California

    Center for Educational Development and Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California

    Los Angeles Biomedical Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, California
    Search for articles by this author
Published:February 01, 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.10.025

      Abstract

      Background: Medical students and Emergency medicine (EM) faculty may have differing opinions on the ideal curriculum during the preclinical years. Objectives: To assess the perceived needs of preclinical medical students exploring EM and compare them with those of EM faculty regarding appropriate educational interventions. Methods: A survey instrument listing 15 workshops related to EM was administered to preclinical medical students in our Emergency Medicine Interest Group (EMIG), and to EM faculty. Respondents graded the perceived utility of each workshop offered at our medical school and those identified via a web search for EMIG. No recommendations for EMIG curriculum were identified through PubMed. Fisher's exact tests were computed using SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) with α = 0.05. Results: There were 48 medical students and 15 faculty members who completed the survey. Students strongly desired workshops in suturing (48/48; 100%), splinting (47/48; 97.9%), and basic electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation (47/48; 97.9%). Least desired topics were history of EM (16/48; 33.3%), getting involved in EM organizations (20/48; 41.7%), and wellness (21/48; 43.8%). Women chose the domestic violence workshop more than men (p = 0.036). Faculty strongly supported workshops in conducting focused history and physical examination (14/15; 93.3%), the specialty of EM (14/15; 93.3%), and basic ECG interpretation (12/15; 80.0%). The lowest rated faculty preferences were ultrasound (5/15; 33.3%), history of EM (7/15; 46.7%), and emergency radiology (7/15; 46.7%). Conclusions: Preclinical students and faculty opinions of important educational workshops differed. Faculty favored the approach to the undifferentiated patient and an introduction to the specialty, whereas students preferred hands-on workshops. Both groups agreed that basic ECG interpretation was useful. These data may be useful for designing an educational program that is interesting to preclinical students while still meeting the needs as perceived by medical student educators.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gonzalez A.
        • Blavo C.
        • Barley G.
        • Steinkohl D.
        • Loeser H.
        What did we learn about early clinical experience?.
        Acad Med. 2001; 76: S49-S54
        • Valkova L.
        First early patient contact for medical students in Prague.
        Fam Pract. 1997; 14: 394-396
        • Dornan T.
        • Bundy C.
        What can experience add to early medical education?.
        BMJ. 2004; 329: 834-837
        • Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME)
        LCME accreditation standards.
        (Accessed May 5, 2009)
        • Kazzi A.
        • Langdorf M.
        • Ghadishah D.
        • Handley N.
        Motivations for a career in emergency medicine; a profile of the 1996 US applicant pool.
        CJEM. 2001; 3: 99-104
        • Littlewood S.
        • Ypinazar V.
        • Margolis S.
        • Scherpbier A.
        • Spencer J.
        • Dorman T.
        Early practical experience and the social responsiveness of clinical education: systematic review.
        BMJ. 2003; 331: 387-391
        • Nieman L.
        • Cheng L.
        • Hormann M.
        • Farnie M.
        • Molong D.
        • Butler P.
        The impact of preclinical preceptorships on learning the fundamentals of clinical medicine and physical diagnosis skills.
        Acad Med. 2006; 81: 342-346
        • Kassebaum D.
        • Szenas P.
        Medical students' career indecision and specialty rejection: roads not taken.
        Acad Med. 1995; 70: 938-943
        • Scott I.
        • Gowans M.
        • Wright B.
        • Brenneis F.
        Why medical students switch careers: changing course during the preclinical years of medical school.
        Can Fam Physician. 2007; 53: 94-95
        • Takayama M.
        • O Neil E.
        Insights into medical students' career choices based on third-and fourth-year students' focus-group discussion.
        Acad Med. 1997; 72: 635-640
        • Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)
        AAMC medical school graduation questionnaire, 2002–2004.
        Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC2005
        • Tardiff K.
        • Cella D.
        • Seiferth C.
        • Perry S.
        Selection and change of specialties by medical school graduates.
        J Med Educ. 1986; 61: 790-796
        • Zink B.
        • Hammoud M.
        • Middleton E.
        • Moroney D.
        • Schigelone A.
        A comprehensive medical student career development program improves medical student satisfaction with career planning.
        Teach Learn Med. 2007; 19: 55-60
        • Coates W.
        • Crooks K.
        • Slavin S.
        • Guiton G.
        • Wilkerson L.
        Medical school curricular reform: fourth-year colleges improve access to career mentoring and overall satisfaction.
        Acad Med. 2008; 83: 754-760