Abstract
Background: The extrauterine migration of an intrauterine device (IUD) can be life
threatening and require emergent surgical intervention and treatment. Migration is
usually the result of IUD expulsion or uterine perforation. Objective: This case report
describes a presentation of extrauterine migration of an IUD due to probable perforation.
Case Report: This is a case report of an uncommon but potentially dangerous outcome
of IUD placement and use. The potential migration of an IUD and resultant uterine
perforation must be considered in the differential diagnosis of any woman using this
type of contraception who presents with abdominal pain. This report is unique due
to the subtle presentation of a potentially life-threatening diagnosis. Conclusion:
This article presents the case, discusses the incidence, potential causes, predisposing
factors, diagnostic modalities, and the course of treatment for this particular diagnosis.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Emergency MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Analysis of client characteristics that may affect early discontinuation of the TCu-380A IUD.Contraception. 1999; 60: 155-160
- Long-term reversible contraception.Contraception. 1997; 56: 341-352
- Effectiveness of IUDs: a review.Contraception. 1987; 36: 55-84
- Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices.World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1987; 753: 1-91
- Risk factors for copper T IUD expulsion: an epidemiologic analysis.Contraception. 1992; 46: 427-433
- Performance of copper intrauterine devices when inserted after an expulsion.Hum Reprod. 1995; 10: 2917-2918
- Partial and complete expulsion of the Multiload 375 IUD and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD after correct insertion.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008; 137: 92-96
- Scheme for the management of lost IUD threads.IPPF Med Bull. 1980; 14: 1-3
- A rare case of IUD expulsion through the fallopian tube.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983; 62: 191-192
- Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology.Thieme, New York2007
- Imaging of contraceptive devices.J Ultrasound Med. 2007; 26: 1389-1401
- Control of intrauterine device insertion with three-dimensional ultrasound: is it the future?.J Clin Ultrasound. 1998; 24: 263-267
- Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2003; 8: 150-155
- Colon penetration by a copper intrauterine device: a case report with literature review.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 279: 395-397
- Intrauterine contraceptive device appendicitis: a case report.World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11: 5414-5415
- Perforations with intrauterine devices: report from a Swedish survey.Contraception. 1998; 57: 251-255
- Greater IUD perforation risk, lactation linked.JAMA. 1983; 249: 3152
Article info
Publication history
Published online: May 31, 2010
Accepted:
April 13,
2010
Received in revised form:
January 24,
2010
Received:
November 21,
2009
Identification
Copyright
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
