The difficulties with gum elastic bougie (GEB) use in the emergency department (ED) have never been studied prospectively.
To determine the most common difficulties associated with endotracheal intubation using a GEB in the ED.
We conducted a prospective, observational study of GEB practices in our two affiliated urban EDs with a 3-year residency training program and an annual census of 150,000 patients. Laryngoscopists performing a GEB-assisted intubation completed a structured data form after laryngoscopy, recording patient characteristics, grade of laryngeal view (using the modified Cormack-Lehane classification), reason for GEB use, and problems encountered. Data were analyzed using standard statistical methods and 95% confidence intervals.
A GEB was used for 88 patients. The overall success rate was 70/88 (79.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 71.1–88.0%). The GEB failure rate of the first laryngoscopist was 25/88 (28.4%; 95% CI 21.0–40.3%), with the two most common reasons being: inability to insert the bougie past the hypopharynx in 13 (52%; 95% CI 32.4–71.6%) and inability to pass the endotracheal tube over the bougie in six (24%; 95% CI 7.3–40.7).
The GEB is a helpful rescue airway device, but emergency care providers should be aware that failure rates are relatively high at a teaching institution.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Success of the gum elastic bougie as a rescue airway in the emergency department.J Emerg Med. 2011; 40: 1-6
- An evaluation of the gum elastic bougie. Intubation times and incidence of sore throat.Anaesthesia. 1992; 47: 878-881
- Orotracheal intubation in patients with potential cervical spine injuries. An indication for the gum elastic bougie.Anaesthesia. 1993; 48: 630-633
- Successful difficult intubation. Use of the gum elastic bougie.Anaesthesia. 1988; 43: 437-438
- Use of the bougie in simulated difficult intubation. 2. Comparison of single-use bougie with multiple-use bougie.Anaesthesia. 2003; 58: 852-855
- A new practical classification of laryngeal view.Anaesthesia. 2000; 55: 274-279
- Survey of the use of the gum elastic bougie in clinical practice.Anaesthesia. 2002; 57: 379-384
- Successful difficult intubation. Tracheal tube placement over a gum-elastic bougie.Anaesthesia. 1990; 45: 774-776
- Successful difficult intubation.Anaesthesia. 1991; 46: 72-73
- Endotracheal intubation with a gum-elastic bougie in unanticipated difficult direct laryngoscopy: comparison of a blind technique versus indirect laryngoscopy with a laryngeal mirror.Anesth Analg. 2002; 95 (table of contents): 1090-1093
- Pharyngeal wall perforation—an unusual complication of blind intubation with a gum elastic bougie.Anaesthesia. 1999; 54: 404-405
- Bougie trauma—it is still possible.Anaesthesia. 2003; 58: 811-813
- Bougie trauma—what trauma?.Anaesthesia. 2003; 58: 192-193
Published online: June 28, 2010
Accepted: May 2, 2010
Received in revised form: February 5, 2010
Received: October 31, 2009
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.