Abstract
Background
Discussion
Conclusions
Keywords
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Emergency MedicineReferences
- Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment.JAMA. 2005; 293: 2609-2617
- Investigation of defensive medicine in Massachusetts. Informational Report: 1-08 – 02.Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham, MANovember 2008
Charrin v. Methodist Hospital, 432 S.W.2d 572 (Tex.Civ.App.1968).
Schneider v. Revici, 817 F.2d 987 (2d Cir. 1987).
McKenna v. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital, Court of Appeal of California, 1979. 93 Cal.App.3d 282, 155 Cal.Rptr. 631.
- Physicians as Good Samaritans. Should they receive immunity for negligence when responding to hospital emergencies?.J Leg Med. 1999; 20: 157-193
Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 111, par. 4400-30; 224 ILCS 60/30 (1992 West).
McCain v. Batson, 760 P.2d 725 (Mont. 1988).
McIntyre v. Ramirez, Texas No. 01-1202, June 26, 2003.
Velasquez v. Jiminez, New Jersey No. A-105-00, May 29, 2002.
Gordin v. William Beaumont Hospital, 180 Mich.App. 488, 447 N.W.2d 793 (1989).
Kearns v. Superior Court, 204 Cal.App.3d 1325, 252 Cal.Rptr. 4 (2 Dist.1988).
- Responding to medical events during commercial airline flights.N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1067-1073
Restatement (Second) of Torts, Section 463–96.
Butterfield v. Forrester. 11 East. 60, 103 Eng. Rep. 926 (K.B. 1809).
Smith v. Hull. 659 N.E.2d 185 (Ind. App. 1995).
Graham v. Keuchel. 847 P.2d 342 (Oklahoma 1993).
Ray v. Wagner, 286 Minn. 354, 176 N.W.2d 101, 104 (1970).
Ostrowski v. Azzara, Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1988. 111 N.J. 429, 545 A.2d 148.
W.P. Keeton, D. Dobbs, R. Keeton and D. Owen, Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts Sec 33, at 196 (5th ed. 1984).
Ross v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, No.M1999-02644-COA-R3-CV, Feb. 18, 2000.
- Malpractice cases in wound care and a legal concept: special defense.West J Emerg Med. 2008; 9: 238-239
Hamilton v. Hardy, 37 Colo. App. 375, 379–80, 549 P.2d 1099, 1104 (1976).
The State Board of Medical Examiners v. McCroskey, 880 P.2d 1188 (Colo. 1994).
Chumbler v. McClure, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, 1974. 505 F.2d 489.
Henderson v. Heyer-Schulte Corp, Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 1980. 600 S.W.2d 844.
Jones v. Chidester, 531 Pa. 31; 610 A.2d 964 (Pa.1992).
Felice v. Valleylab, 520 So.2d 920 (La.App. 3d Cir.1987).
Tramontin v. Glass, 668 So.2d 1252 (La.App.1996).
Brook v. St. John’s Hickey Memorial Hospital, Supreme Court of Indiana, 1978. 269 Ind. 270, 380 N.E.2d 72.
- Validation of diphenhydramine as a dermal local anesthetic.Ann Emerg Med. 1994; 23: 1284-1289
- Double-blinded comparison of diphenhydramine versus lidocaine as a local anesthetic.Ann Emerg Med. 1993; 22: 1419-1422
