This study from Salzburg, Austria evaluated a novel approach to radiological evaluation
of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. The authors felt that the traditional
Zanca and axillary lateral views failed to adequately characterize horizontal instability
in AC joint injuries. To that end, they used supine axillary lateral views with the
arm in 90° of abduction and 60° of flexion and developed a gleno-acromio-clavicular
angle (GACA) to quantify the anteroposterior translation of the clavicle. Twenty-five
patients with first-time acute AC joint injuries were enrolled, and the absolute GACA
difference between the neutral and anterior position of the injured arms was compared
with the GACA difference in the uninjured arms, which served as controls. Eleven of
the 25 subjects showed no evidence of horizontal instability, with the average GACA
difference between neutral and anterior positions demonstrating no discrepancy between
injured and uninjured shoulders (7.1° ± 4.8° vs. 7.1° ± 5.5°, respectively). Fourteen
of the 25 subjects had anteroposterior translation, with a GACA difference of 30.3°
± 14.3° (p<0.001). Twenty-four percent of the entire study population (2 patients with Rockwood
type II injuries and 4 patients with type III injuries) had normal axillary views
when evaluated by the traditional radiographic method but were found to have anteroposterior
instability when the functional axillary views were used. The authors concluded that
functional axillary radiographic evaluation is an effective tool at detecting horizontal
instability in acute AC joint injuries.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Emergency MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.