An estimated 12–25% of adnexal torsion is found in pregnant women; the authors sought
to characterize this rare and dangerous condition as the published data on this population
currently comprise only small case series and anecdotal case reports. This case-control
study compared the manifestations, treatment, and outcomes of adnexal torsion in pregnant
vs. non-pregnant women. The study population included a total of 118 women with surgically
confirmed adnexal torsion, 41 of whom were pregnant, in two institutions in Tel Aviv
over a period of 9 years. Seventy-seven non-pregnant women who presented during the
same time period were considered the control group. Pregnant women with torsion presented
very similarly to non-pregnant women, with acute abdominal and pelvic pain, nausea,
and vomiting. They were more likely to have peritoneal signs (42.8% compared with
19%) and also more likely to have a false-negative Doppler ultrasound (61.1% compared
with 45.1%), although this latter difference was not significant. Assisted reproductive
technology (ART) was strongly correlated with an increased risk of torsion, both in
pregnant and non-pregnant women. Seventy-three percent of the pregnant women with
confirmed torsion had undergone ART treatment and 20% of non-pregnant women had previously
undergone ART. Pregnant women with torsion were likely to have torsion recur during
the same pregnancy, at a rate of 19.5%. These women generally did very well with operative
intervention, with uncomplicated pregnancies reported in all but three women.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Emergency MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.