This prospective interventional study from France aimed to further characterize the
hemodynamic effects of norepinephrine (NE). The authors hypothesized that in addition
to its powerful vasoconstrictive arterial effects, NE also exerts an effect on the
venous side, increasing venous return, cardiac preload, and cardiac output. This non-blinded
single-arm study was conducted in a university hospital in a 15-bed medical intensive
care unit and included patients who had a diagnosis of sepsis and circulatory shock
(defined as systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg plus decreased urine output or heart
rate > 100 beats/min or skin mottling), an NE infusion already in place, a diastolic
blood pressure < 40 mm Hg, and a positive passive leg raise (PLR). The investigators
first recorded baseline hemodynamic measurements including heart rate (HR), systemic
mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), left ventricular end-diastolic
area (LVEDA), and cardiac index (CI), then recorded these same measurements when the
PLR maneuver had its maximum effect to determine whether the patient was preload-dependent.
The patient was then returned to a semi-recumbent position and the dose of NE was
increased. After hemodynamic variables had time to stabilize on the higher dose of
NE, another set of measurements was recorded. Next, another PLR was performed with
another set of measurements at the time of the maneuver's maximum effect, followed
by a 500-mL saline bolus and one final set of measurements. The study included a total
of 25 patients. The authors found that PLR increased MAP, CVP, LVEDA, and CI, as did
increasing the dose of NE. They also found that the second PLR (on the higher dose
of NE) increased MAP, CVP, LVEDA, and CI but with smaller amplitude than that of the
first PLR. The saline bolus also resulted in an increase in MAP, CVP, LVEDA, and CI.
The authors concluded that NE increased preload as well as CI. They also concluded
that CI increased less with PLR after the dose of NE was increased; however, the PLR
still seemed to predict which patients would respond to fluid challenge.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Emergency MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.