The growing percentage of Americans on anti-platelet therapy has lead to an increased
incidence of anticoagulated patients within the emergency department with minor traumatic
brain injury. There has been a considerable amount of literature attempting to determine
the proper management of these patients. In this retrospective chart review of 108
patients on antiplatelet therapy with isolated minor traumatic brain injury (MTBI
= Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≥ 13 plus intracranial hemorrhage [ICH] found on
head computed tomography [CT]) admitted to a Level 1 trauma center, the authors attempted
to determine whether platelet transfusions led to improved neurological outcomes.
Patients were excluded from the study if they were on other forms of anticoagulation,
if their intracranial hemorrhages required immediate operative management, or if any
other trauma was discovered. Platelets and other blood products were transfused at
the discretion of the neurosurgeon. Of the 108 patients within the study, 44 patients
(41%) were transfused platelets during their hospital stay. There were no differences
in basic demographics between patients receiving platelets and patients not receiving
platelets, although there was a significantly increased percentage of patients taking
clopidogrel in the group who received a platelet transfusion (52% vs. 20%, p = 0.0005). There were also significant differences in the characteristics of the
ICHs between patient groups, with patients receiving a platelet transfusion having
higher ICH volumes (20.6 mL vs. 8.2 mL, p = 0.02) and having higher Marshall classification (a CT classification for TBI, Marshall
class VI platelet group = 32% vs no-platelet group 11%, p = 0.043), but no difference in overall GCS, in Rotterdam score (a separate CT score
for TBI), or in the percentage of patients with a midline shift > 5 mm. There was
no difference in the primary outcome of overall neurological decline between patients
who received platelets and those who did not (platelet group 0% vs. 3%, p = 0.51). There was also no significant difference in the need for subsequent surgical
intervention, overall medical decline, final GCS, or in deaths.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Emergency MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.