Advertisement
Original Contributions| Volume 43, ISSUE 4, P584-592, October 2012

Proposed Bedside Maneuver to Facilitate Accurate Anatomic Orientation for Correct Positioning of ECG Precordial Leads V1 and V2: A Pilot Study

  • Michael H. Lehmann
    Correspondence
    Reprint Address: Michael H. Lehmann, md, Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Aimee M. Katona
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Background

      Misplacement of right precordial electrocardiogram (ECG) electrodes superiorly is a prevalent procedural error that may lead to false findings of T-wave inversion or QS complexes in V2—possibly triggering wasteful utilization of health care resources. Standard technique for proper placement of V1–V2 entails initial palpation for the sternal angle, pointing to the second intercostal space (ICS), followed by lead fixation at the fourth ICS.

      Study Objective

      Because adherence to this approach may be limited by lack of a visual landmark for the second ICS, we assessed an alternative technique.

      Methods

      The evaluated technique involved placement of the patient’s hand up against the base of his/her neck (H→N maneuver) to help demarcate visually a specific point “X” on the chest.

      Results

      Of 112 patients studied, “X” landed on the first rib in 2.7%, first ICS in 7.1%, second rib in 56.3%, second ICS in 33.0%, and third rib in 0.9%. Thus, in 89.3% (95% confidence interval 83.6–95.0%) of cases (93.3% of men, 84.6% of women; p=0.13), the second ICS could be identified by H→N via the following simple rule: Utilize “X” if it overlies an ICS; or the immediately subjacent ICS if “X” overlies a rib.

      Conclusion

      The H→N maneuver provides a primarily visual approach to identifying the second ICS and, thereby, the fourth ICS for affixing V1–V2. If the present initial experience is confirmed, H→N might merit consideration as an educational tool to promote anatomically correct placement of these precordial leads, a prerequisite to diminishing the incidence of ECG procedure-related “septal ischemia/infarction.”

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kligfield P.
        • Gettes L.S.
        • Bailey J.J.
        • et al.
        Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology.
        Circulation. 2007; 115: 1306-1324
        • Benner J.P.
        • Borloz M.P.
        • Adams M.
        • Brady W.J.
        Impact of the 12-lead electrocardiogram on ED evaluation and management.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2007; 25: 942-948
        • Barnes A.R.
        • Pardee H.E.B.
        • White P.D.
        • Wilson F.N.
        • Wolferth C.C.
        Standardization of precordial leads: joint recommendations of the American Heart Association and the Cardiac Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
        Am Heart J. 1938; 15: 107-108
        • Barnes A.R.
        • Pardee H.E.B.
        • White P.D.
        • Wilson F.N.
        • Wolferth C.C.
        Standardization of precordial leads: supplementary report.
        Am Heart J. 1938; 15: 235-239
        • Herman M.V.
        • Ingram D.A.
        • Levy J.A.
        • Cook J.R.
        • Athans R.J.
        Variability of electrocardiographic precordial lead placement: a method to improve accuracy and reliability.
        Clin Cardiol. 1991; 14: 469-476
        • Wegner W.
        • Kligfield P.
        Variability of precordial electrode placement during routine electrocardiography.
        J Electrocardiol. 1996; 29: 179-184
        • Laks M.M.
        The ECG bridge to the twenty-first century: progress report for 1997 and future directions (presidential talk at Palm Coast 1997).
        J Electrocardiol. 1998; 30: 196-197
        • Castellanos A.
        • Interian A.
        • Myerburg R.J.
        The resting electrocardiogram.
        in: Fuster V. Alexander R.W. O’Rourke R.A. Hurst’s the heart. 10th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York2001: 281-314
        • Madias J.E.
        Serial ECG recordings via marked chest wall landmarks: an essential requirement for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block.
        J Electrocardiol. 2002; 35: 299-302
        • Madias J.E.
        On the appropriate recording of the electrocardiogram.
        J Electrocardiol. 2007; 40: 65-66
        • Sejersten M.
        • Pahlm O.
        • Pettersson J.
        • et al.
        The relative accuracies of ECG precordial lead waveforms derived from EASI leads and those acquired from paramedic applied standard leads.
        J Electrocardiol. 2003; 36: 179-185
        • McCann K.
        • Holdgate A.
        • Mahammad R.
        • Waddington A.
        Accuracy of ECG electrode placement by emergency department clinicians.
        Emerg Med Australas. 2007; 19: 442-448
        • Zema M.J.
        • Luminais S.K.
        • Chiaramida S.
        • Goldman M.
        • Kligfield P.
        Electrocardiographic poor R wave progression: III the normal variant.
        J Electrocardiol. 1980; 13: 135-142
        • Kerwin A.J.
        • McLean R.
        • Tegelaar H.
        A method for the accurate placement of chest electrodes in the taking of serial electrocardiographic tracings.
        Can Med Assoc J. 1960; 82: 258-261
        • Harper R.J.
        • Richards C.F.
        Electrode misplacement and artifact.
        in: Chan T.C. Brady W.J. Harrigan R.A. ECG in emergency medicine and acute care. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, PA2005: 16-21
        • Lloyd G.
        No test is too routine to do properly.
        Int J Clin Pract. 2008; 62: 8-9
        • Marafioti V.
        • Variola A.
        Pseudoinfarction pattern by misplacement of electrocardiographic precordial leads.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2004; 22: 62-63
        • Surawicz B.
        • Knilans T.K.
        Chou’s electrocardiography in clinical practice.
        5th edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA2001
        • Surawicz B.
        • Van Horne R.G.
        • Urbach J.R.
        • Bellet S.
        QS- and QR-pattern in leads V3 and V4 in absence of myocardial infarction: electrocardiographic and vectrocardiographic study.
        Circulation. 1955; 12: 391-405
        • MacAlpin R.N.
        Clinical significance of QS complexes in V1 and V2 without other electrocardiographic abnormality.
        Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2004; 9: 39-47
        • Sgarbossa E.B.
        • Wagner G.
        Electrocardiography.
        in: Topol E.J. Textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA2006: 977-1011
        • Ilg K.J.
        • Lehmann M.H.
        Importance of recognizing pseudo-septal infarction due to electrocardiographic lead misplacement.
        Am J Med. 2012; 125: 23-27
        • Lehmann M.H.
        • Brugada R.
        Brugada syndrome: diagnositic pitfalls.
        J Emerg Med. 2009; 37: 79-81
        • MacKenzie R.
        Poor R-wave progression.
        J Insur Med. 2005; 37: 58-62
        • Surawicz B.
        • Knilans T.K.
        Chou’s electrocardiography in clinical practice.
        5th edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA2001
      1. Macfarlane P.W. Lawrie T.D.K. Comprehensive electrocardiology: theory and practice in health and disease. Volume 3. Pergamon Press, New York1989
        • Myers G.B.
        • Klein H.A.
        • Stofer B.E.
        Correlation of electrocardiographic and pathologic findings in anteroseptal infarction.
        Am Heart J. 1948; 36: 535-575
        • Surawicz B.
        • Uhley H.
        • Borun R.
        • et al.
        The quest for optimal electrocardiography. Task Force I: standardization of terminology and interpretation.
        Am J Cardiol. 1978; 41: 130-145
        • Mason J.W.
        • Buxton A.E.
        • Griffin J.C.
        • et al.
        ECG-SAP (Electrocardiography Self-Assessment Program): examination book.
        American College of Cardiology, Bethesda, MD1995
      2. Macfarlane P.W. Lawrie T.D.K. Comprehensive electrocardiology: theory and practice in health and disease. Volume 3. Pergamon Press, New York1989
        • GE Healthcare
        Marquette™ 12SL™ ECG analysis program: physician’s guide, revision E.
        GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI2008
        • Roberts W.C.
        • Gardin J.M.
        Location of myocardial infarcts: a confusion of terms and definitions.
        Am J Cardiol. 1978; 42: 868-872
        • Shalev Y.
        • Fogelman R.
        • Oettinger M.
        • Caspi A.
        Does the electrocardiographic pattern of “anteroseptal” myocardial infarction correlate with the anatomic location of myocardial injury?.
        Am J Cardiol. 1995; 75: 763-766
        • Porter A.
        • Strasberg B.
        • Vaturi M.
        • et al.
        Correlation between electrocardiographic subtypes of anterior myocardial infarction and regional abnormalities of wall motion.
        Coron Artery Dis. 2000; 11: 489-493
        • Bayés de Luna A.
        • Cino J.M.
        • Pujadas S.
        • et al.
        Concordance of electrocardiographic patterns and healed myocardial infarction location detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
        Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97: 443-451
        • Garcia-Niebla J.
        Comparison of P-wave patterns derived from correct and incorrect placement of V1-V2 electrodes.
        J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009; 24: 156-161
        • Chung E.K.
        Electrocardiography: practical applications with vectorial principles.
        3rd edn. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk, CT1985
        • Goldman M.J.
        Principles of clinical electrocardiography.
        12th edn. Lange Medical Publications, Los Altos, CA1986
        • Dunn M.I.
        • Lipman B.S.
        Lipman-Massie clinical electrocardiography.
        8th edn. Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, Chicago, IL1989
        • Wagner G.S.
        Marriott’s practical electrocardiography.
        10th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA2001
        • Kernicki J.G.
        • Weiler K.M.
        Electrocardiography for nurses: physiological correlates.
        John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY1981
        • Sweetwood H.M.
        Clinical electrocardiography for nurses.
        2nd edn. Aspen Publishers, Rockville, MD1989
        • Erickson B.
        Introduction to electrocardiography.
        in: Kinney M.R. Packa D.R. Comprehensive cardiac care. 8th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, MO1996: 58-85
        • Jacobson C.
        Electrocardiography.
        in: Woods S.L. Froelicher E.S. Motzer S.A.U. Cardiac nursing. 5th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA2005: 326-360
        • Beasley B.
        • West M.
        Understanding 12-lead EKGs: a practical approach.
        2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ2006
        • Goldberger A.L.
        Clinical electrocardiography: a simplified approach.
        7th edn. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, PA2006
        • Rautaharju P.M.
        • Park L.
        • Rautaharju F.S.
        • Crow R.
        A standardized procedure for locating and documenting ECG chest electrode positions.
        J Electrocardiol. 1998; 31: 17-29
        • Erling B.F.
        • Perron A.D.
        Standard 12-lead electrocardiogram: principles and techniques.
        in: Chan T.C. Brady W.J. Harrigan R.A. ECG in emergency medicine and acute care. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, PA2005: 3-6
        • Coleman M.E.
        What the Journal of Electrocardiology can do for electrocardiogram technologists: an electrocardiogram technologist’s perspective.
        J Electrocardiol. 2006; 39: 3-6
        • Rajaganeshan R.
        • Ludlam C.L.
        • Francis D.P.
        Accuracy in ECG lead placement among technicians, nurses, general physicians and cardiologists.
        Int J Clin Pract. 2008; 62: 65-70
        • Rautaharju P.M.
        • Wolf H.K.
        • Eifler W.J.
        • Blackburn H.
        A simple procedure for positioning precordial ECG and VCG electrodes using an electrode locator.
        J Electrocardiol. 1976; 9: 35-40
        • Bell S.J.
        • Clifton J.
        • Pease J.
        • et al.
        The evaluation of a precordial ECG belt: technologist satisfaction and accuracy of recording.
        J Electrocardiol. 2001; 34: 155-159
        • Baas L.S.
        • Beery T.A.
        • Allen G.A.
        • Ware S.
        • Lamba S.
        • Abraham W.T.
        Accuracy of the precordial V-quick patch in persons with cardiac or pulmonary disease.
        J Emerg Med. 2003; 24: 131-139
        • Brown D.W.
        • Xie J.
        • Mensah G.A.
        Electrocardiographic recording and timeliness of clinician evaluation in the emergency department in patients presenting with chest pain.
        Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99: 1115-1118
        • Brady W.J.
        • Perron A.D.
        • Chan T.
        Electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation: correct identification of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and non-AMI syndromes by emergency physicians.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8: 349-360
        • Masoudi F.A.
        • Magid D.J.
        • Vinson D.R.
        Implications of the failure to identify high-risk electrocardiogram findings for the quality of care of patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the emergency department quality in myocardial infarction (EDQMI) study.
        Circulation. 2006; 114: 1565-1571
        • Turnipseed S.D.
        • Bair A.E.
        • Kirk J.D.
        • Diercks D.B.
        • Tabar P.
        • Amsterdam E.A.
        Electrocardiogram differentiation of benign early repolarization versus acute myocardial infarction by emergency physicians and cardiologists.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 961-966
        • Yan R.T.
        • Yan A.T.
        • Allegrone J.
        Differences between local hospital and core laboratory interpretation of the admission electrocardiogram in patients with acute coronary syndromes and their relation to outcome.
        Am J Cardiol. 2007; 100: 169-174
        • McAdams M.A.
        • Van Dam R.M.
        • Hu F.B.
        Comparison of self-reported and measured BMI as correlates of disease markers in U.S. adults.
        Obesity. 2007; 15: 188-196