Advertisement
Education| Volume 44, ISSUE 5, P995-998, May 2013

Download started.

Ok

Google Internet Searches on Residency Applicants Do Not Facilitate the Ranking Process

Published:January 25, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.09.032
Google Internet Searches on Residency Applicants Do Not Facilitate the Ranking Process
Previous ArticleRe: Preoxygenation, Reoxygenation, and Delayed Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department
Next ArticleImproved Physician Consult Response Times in an Academic Emergency Department After Implementation of an Institutional Guideline

      Abstract

      Background

      Information used by program directors (PDs) to evaluate and rank residency applicants is largely limited to the Electronic Residency Application Service and the interview day. The Internet represents a potential source of additional data on applicants. Recent surveys reveal that up to 90% of United States (US) companies are already using the Internet to post jobs and to screen candidates. However, its use in residency applicant evaluation is not well studied.

      Objective

      We hypothesize that the Internet, through the use of a Google search, will provide useful information to PDs in ranking applicants.

      Methods

      This prospective observational study was completed by six Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited Emergency Medicine residency programs. After the interview process, programs formed their rank order list in their usual fashion. Then participating programs performed a Google search on applicants from their list. A standardized search was used and information reviewed was limited to the first two Google pages. The main outcome measure was change in an applicant's status on the rank order list. Change in status was based on the judgment of the individual program's PD.

      Results

      A total of 547 applicants were reviewed. The time for review of information was 4,386 min total and a mean of 7.2 min per resident. Position on the rank order list was changed for three applicants; two moved up on the list and one moved down. Four programs made no changes. No applicants were removed.

      Conclusions

      The Internet, through the use of a Google search, did not appear to provide useful information in a time-effective manner to PDs in ranking applicants.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Google reaches 1 billion global visitors. Available at: http://www.comscoredatamine.com/2011/06/google-reaches-1-billion-global-visitors/. Accessed November 1, 2011.

        View in Article

      2. North America Internet usage. Available at: http://www.internetworldstats.com/america.htm. Accessed November 1, 2011.

        View in Article

      3. Swallow E. How businesses use social media for recruiting. August 28, 2011. Mashable Business. Available at: http://mashable.com/2011/08/28/social-media-recruiting-infographic/. Accessed September 24, 2011.

        View in Article

      4. Swallow E. How recruiters use social networks to screen candidates. October 23, 2011. Mashable Business. Available at: http://mashable.com/2011/10/23/how-recruiters-use-social-networks-to-screen-candidates-infographic/. Accessed November 28, 2011.

        View in Article

      5. Du W. Job candidates getting tripped up by Facebook. August 2007. MSNBC. Available at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20202935/ns/business-school_inc_/t/job-candidates-getting-tripped-facebook/. Accessed September 24, 2011.

        View in Article
        • Finn G.
        • Garner J.
        • Sawdon M.
        You're judged all the time! Students' views on professionalism: a multicenter study.
        Med Educ. 2010; 44: 814-825
        View in Article
        • Thurman J.
        • Katz E.
        • Carter W.
        • et al.
        Emergency medicine residency applicant perceptions of unethical recruiting practices and illegal questioning in the match.
        Acad Emrg Med. 2009; 16: 550-557
        View in Article
        • Garner J.
        • O'Sullivan H.
        Facebook and the professional behaviors of undergraduate medical students.
        Clin Teach. 2010; 7: 112-115
        View in Article
        • MacDonald J.
        • Sohn S.
        • Ellis P.
        Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctors.
        Med Educ. 2010; 44: 805-813
        View in Article

      10. Levinson M. Social networks: a new hotbed for hiring discrimination claims. April 2011. CIO. Available at: http://www.cio.com/article/679830/Social_Networks_A_New_Hotbed_for_Hiring_Discrimination_Claims_. Accessed September 24, 2011.

        View in Article

      Article info

      Publication history

      Published online: January 25, 2013
      Accepted: September 18, 2012
      Received in revised form: August 24, 2012
      Received: March 24, 2012

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.09.032

      Copyright

      © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect

      The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.


      RELX