Advertisement
Journal of Emergency Medicine
AAEM
Advanced searchSave search
Administration of Emergency Medicine| Volume 45, ISSUE 1, P111-116.e3, July 2013

Download started.

Ok

A Survey of Emergency Physicians Regarding Due Process, Financial Pressures, and the Ability to Advocate for Patients

Published:April 19, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.12.019
A Survey of Emergency Physicians Regarding Due Process, Financial Pressures, and the Ability to Advocate for Patients
Previous ArticleEmergency Department Medication History Taking: Current Inefficiency and Potential for a Self-Administered Form
Next ArticleIs Emergency Department Cardioversion of Recent-onset Atrial Fibrillation Safe and Effective?

      Abstract

      Background

      A 1998 survey of emergency physicians indicated that many were threatened with adverse actions when advocating regarding the quality of care or raising concerns about financial issues.

      Study Objectives

      To assess the current state of these issues.

      Methods

      An anonymous electronic survey of emergency physicians was conducted using the American Medical Association’s database.

      Results

      Of the 1035 emergency physicians who received the survey, 389 (37.6%) answered the questions. Over half had been in practice for 16 or more years and 86% were board certified. Of those who knew the answer to the question, 62% (197 of 317) reported that their employer could terminate them without full due process and 76% (216 of 284) reported that the hospital administration could order their removal from the clinical schedule. Nearly 20% reported a possible or real threat to their employment if they raised quality-of-care concerns. Financial pressures related to admission, discharge, and transfer of patients were also noted by a number of respondents. Physicians who worked for contract management companies reported a higher incidence of impaired practice rights.

      Conclusion

      Practicing emergency physicians continue to report substantial concerns regarding their ability to speak up about the quality of care and pressure regarding financial matters related to patient care.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Weiss LD. American Academy of Emergency Medicine white paper on due process rights for emergency physicians. Available at: http://www.aaem.org/em-resources/position-statements/2007/due-process-whitepaper. Accessed August 20, 2012.

        View in Article
        • Plantz S.H.
        • Kreplick L.W.
        • Panacek E.A.
        • Meht T.
        • McNamara R.M.
        A national survey of board-certified emergency physicians: quality of care and practice structure issues.
        Am J Emerg Med. 1998; 16: 1-4
        View in Article
        • Tang N.
        • Stein J.
        • Hsia R.Y.
        • Maselli J.H.
        • Gonzales R.
        Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997–2007.
        JAMA. 2010; 304: 664-670
        View in Article
        • Henneman P.L.
        • Lemanski M.
        • Smithline H.A.
        • Tomaszewski A.
        • Mayforth J.A.
        Emergency department admissions are more profitable than non-emergency department admissions.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 53: 249-255
        View in Article

      5. Tenet Healthcare Corporation v. Community Health Systems, Inc., et al. United States District Court, Northern Texas District Civ. No. 3:11-cv-00732-M. May 16, 2011.

        View in Article

      6. Creswell J, Abelson R. A hospital war reflects bind for doctors in the U.S. New York Times. November 30, 2012. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/01/business/a-hospital-war-reflects-a-tightening-bind-for-doctors-nationwide.html. December 5, 2012.

        View in Article

      7. Jewett C, Doig SK. Admission practices drive Prime profits: Emergency room visits often lead to longer stays. California Watch. July 23, 2011. Available at: http://m.redding.com/news/2011/jul/23/admission-practices-drive-prime-profits/. Accessed December 5, 2012.

        View in Article
        • McNamara R.M.
        Contract management groups: a detriment to the specialty and practitioners of emergency medicine.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1994; 23: 1350-1353
        View in Article
        • Serbaroli F.J.
        The corporate practice of medicine prohibition in the modern era of health care. BNA’s Health Law and Business Series no. 2800.
        Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC1999
        View in Article
        • Cydulka R.K.
        • Korte R.
        Career satisfaction in emergency medicine: the ABEM longitudinal study of emergency physicians.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 51: 714-722
        View in Article

      11. Darlak v. Bobear, 814 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir. 1987).

        View in Article

      12. 42 U.S.C. §§11101–11152.

        View in Article
        • Counselman F.L.
        • Marco C.A.
        • Patrick V.C.
        • et al.
        A study of the workforce in emergency medicine: 2007.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2009; 27: 691-700
        View in Article

      Article info

      Publication history

      Published online: April 19, 2013
      Accepted: December 18, 2012
      Received in revised form: December 7, 2012
      Received: September 6, 2012

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.12.019

      Copyright

      © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX