‘‘Rectal Intussusception’’: Avoid the Confusion

      We read with interest the recent article by Elmer and Sajed, but the discussion that follows the illustrative case seems somewhat confusing (
      • Elmer J.
      • Sajed D.
      Rectal intussusception.
      ). The authors discuss “sigmoidorectal intussusception,” a rare condition different from rectal intussusception (RI), which is a common form of rectal prolapse.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Elmer J.
        • Sajed D.
        Rectal intussusception.
        J Emerg Med. 2012; 43: 706-707
        • Weilbaecher D.
        • Bolin J.A.
        • Hearn D.
        • et al.
        Intussusception in adults: review of 160 cases.
        Am J Surg. 1971; 121: 531-535
        • Wu J.S.
        Rectal prolapse: a historical perspective.
        Curr Probl Surg. 2009; 46: 602-716
        • Bartolo D.C.C.
        • Roe A.M.
        • Virjee J.
        • Mortensen N.J.
        Evacuation proctography in obstructed defaecation and rectal intussusception.
        Br J Surg. 1985; 72: S111-S116
        • O'Brien D.P.
        Rectal prolapse.
        Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2007; 20: 125-132
        • Felt-Bersma R.J.
        • Tiersma E.S.
        • Cuesta M.A.
        Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and enterocele.
        Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2008; 37: 645-668
        • Shorvon P.J.
        • McHugh S.
        • Diamant N.E.
        • et al.
        Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications.
        Gut. 1989; 30: 1737-1749