Advertisement
Selected Topics: Prehospital Care| Volume 46, ISSUE 5, P643-649, May 2014

The Most Effective Rescuer's Position for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Provided to Patients on Beds: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Mannequin Study

  • Author Footnotes
    1 Chong Kun Hong and Sang O Park are the first authors, who contributed equally to the study.
    Chong Kun Hong
    Footnotes
    1 Chong Kun Hong and Sang O Park are the first authors, who contributed equally to the study.
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea

    Department of Emergency Medicine, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Chong Kun Hong and Sang O Park are the first authors, who contributed equally to the study.
    Sang O Park
    Footnotes
    1 Chong Kun Hong and Sang O Park are the first authors, who contributed equally to the study.
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Han Ho Jeong
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medical Technology, Masan University, Changwon, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jung Hyun Kim
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medical Technology, Masan University, Changwon, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Na Kyoung Lee
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kyoung Yul Lee
    Affiliations
    Department of Physical Education, Kyungnam University, Changwon, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Younghwan Lee
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym Sacred Heart Hospital, School of Medicine, Hallym University, Anyang, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jun Ho Lee
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Seong Youn Hwang
    Correspondence
    Reprint Address: Seong Youn Hwang, md, Department of Emergency Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Changwon 630-522, Republic of Korea
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Chong Kun Hong and Sang O Park are the first authors, who contributed equally to the study.
Published:November 21, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.085

      Abstract

      Background

      The effectiveness of chest compressions for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is affected by the rescuer's position with respect to the patient. In hospitals, chest compressions are typically performed while standing beside the patient, who is placed on a bed.

      Study Objectives

      To compare the effectiveness of chest compressions, performed on a bed during 2 min of CPR, among three different rescuer positions: standing, on a footstool, or kneeling on the bed.

      Methods

      We performed a crossover randomized simulation trial. Participants were recruited from among students in the Department of Paramedics from July to August 2011. Thirty-eight participants were enrolled, and they performed chest compressions on a mannequin for 2 min in each of the three different positions, with a 1-week interval between each position.

      Results

      The number of adequate compressions (depth > 50 mm) and the mean compression depth were significantly greater in the kneeling and footstool positions than in the standing position, but there was no significant difference between the kneeling and footstool positions. There were no significant differences in the compression rate, the percentage of correctly released compressions, and the percentage of compressions performed using the correct hand position among the three rescuer positions.

      Conclusion

      The mean compression depth and the number of adequate compressions were greater for both the kneeling and footstool positions than for the standing position during 2 min of CPR. We recommend kneeling on a bed or standing on a footstool as the rescuer positions during hospital CPR on a bed.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Berg R.A.
        • Hemphill R.
        • Abella B.S.
        • et al.
        Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
        Circulation. 2010; 122: S685-S705
        • Hightower D.
        • Thomas S.H.
        • Stone C.K.
        • Dunn K.
        • March J.A.
        Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 26: 300-303
        • Hong D.Y.
        • Park S.O.
        • Lee K.R.
        • Baek K.J.
        • Shin D.H.
        A different rescuer changing strategy between 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation that considers rescuer factors: a randomised cross-over simulation study with a time-dependent analysis.
        Resuscitation. 2012; 83: 353-359
        • Heidenreich J.W.
        • Bonner A.
        • Sanders A.B.
        Rescuer fatigue in the elderly: standard vs. hands-only CPR.
        J Emerg Med. 2012; 42: 88-92
        • Nishiyama C.
        • Iwami T.
        • Kawamura T.
        • et al.
        Quality of chest compressions during continuous CPR; comparison between chest compression-only CPR and conventional CPR.
        Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 1152-1155
        • Tweed M.
        • Tweed C.
        • Perkins G.D.
        The effect of differing support surfaces on the efficacy of chest compressions using a resuscitation manikin model.
        Resuscitation. 2001; 51: 179-183
        • Jantti H.
        • Silfvast T.
        • Turpeinen A.
        • Kiviniemi V.
        • Uusaro A.
        Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on manikins: on the floor and in the bed.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009; 53: 1131-1137
        • Foo N.P.
        • Chang J.H.
        • Lin H.J.
        • Guo H.R.
        Rescuer fatigue and cardiopulmonary resuscitation positions: a randomized controlled crossover trial.
        Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 579-584
        • Cho J.
        • Oh J.H.
        • Park Y.S.
        • Park I.C.
        • Chung S.P.
        Effects of bed height on the performance of chest compressions.
        Emerg Med J. 2009; 26: 807-810
        • Lewinsohn A.
        • Sherren P.B.
        • Wijayatilake D.S.
        The effects of bed height and time on the quality of chest compressions delivered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised crossover simulation study.
        Emerg Med J. 2012; 29: 660-663
        • Christenson J.
        • Andrusiek D.
        • Everson-Stewart S.
        • et al.
        Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation.
        Circulation. 2009; 120: 1241-1247
        • Abella B.S.
        • Sandbo N.
        • Vassilatos P.
        • et al.
        Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Circulation. 2005; 111: 428-434
        • Perkins G.D.
        • Smith C.M.
        • Augre C.
        • et al.
        Effects of a backboard, bed height, and operator position on compression depth during simulated resuscitation.
        Intensive Care Med. 2006; 32: 1632-1635
        • Chi C.H.
        • Tsou J.Y.
        • Su F.C.
        Effects of rescuer position on the kinematics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the force of delivered compressions.
        Resuscitation. 2008; 76: 69-75