Advertisement
Education| Volume 47, ISSUE 4, P432-440, October 2014

Practicing Emergency Physicians Report Performing Well on Most Emergency Medicine Milestones

Published:July 07, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.04.032
Practicing Emergency Physicians Report Performing Well on Most Emergency Medicine Milestones
Previous ArticleRight Paracardiac Mass and Hypovolemic Shock After Cardiac Surgery
Next ArticleEntrustable Professional Activities: Making Sense of the Emergency Medicine Milestones

      Abstract

      Background

      The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Next Accreditation System endorsed specialty-specific milestones as the foundation of an outcomes-based resident evaluation process. These milestones represent five competency levels (entry level to expert), and graduating residents will be expected to meet Level 4 on all 23 milestones. Limited validation data on these milestones exist. It is unclear if higher levels represent true competencies of practicing emergency medicine (EM) attendings.

      Objective

      Our aim was to examine how practicing EM attendings in academic and community settings self-evaluate on the new EM milestones.

      Methods

      An electronic self-evaluation survey outlining 9 of the 23 EM milestones was sent to a sample of practicing EM attendings in academic and community settings. Attendings were asked to identify which level was appropriate for them.

      Results

      Seventy-nine attendings were surveyed, with an 89% response rate. Sixty-one percent were academic. Twenty-three percent (95% confidence interval [CI] 20%−27%) of all responses were Levels 1, 2, or 3; 38% (95% CI 34%−42%) were Level 4; and 39% (95% CI 35%−43%) were Level 5. Seventy-seven percent of attendings found themselves to be Level 4 or 5 in eight of nine milestones. Only 47% found themselves to be Level 4 or 5 in ultrasound skills (p = 0.0001).

      Conclusions

      Although a majority of EM attendings reported meeting Level 4 milestones, many felt they did not meet Level 4 criteria. Attendings report less perceived competence in ultrasound skills than other milestones. It is unclear if self-assessments reflect the true competency of practicing attendings. The study design can be useful to define the accuracy, precision, and validity of milestones for any medical field.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nasca T.J.
        The Next Accreditation System—rational and benefits.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1051-1056
        View in Article
        • Ling L.J.
        • Beeson M.S.
        Milestones in emergency medicine.
        J Acute Med. 2012; 2: 65-69
        View in Article
        • Beeson M.S.
        • Carter W.A.
        • Christopher T.A.
        • et al.
        The development of the emergency medicine milestones.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2013; 20: 724-729
        View in Article

      4. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common program requirements. ACGME Approved Standards. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs2013.pdf. September 26, 2010. Accessed June 15, 2014.

        View in Article

      5. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Emergency Medicine. The emergency medicine milestones project. ACGME Next Accreditation System: Rationale and Benefits, Milestones. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/EmergencyMedicineMilestones.pdf. December 2012. Accessed June 15, 2014.

        View in Article

      6. Beeson M. Emergency medicine milestones. 2012 CORD Academic Assembly Schedule/Handouts/Materials, Day 1. Available at: http://www.cordem.org/files/DOCUMENTLIBRARY/2012%20AA%20Handouts/1%20Day/CORD%20AA%20milestones%20(2).ppt. April 10, 2012. Accessed June 15, 2014.

        View in Article
        • Perina D.G.
        • Brunett C.P.
        • Caro D.A.
        • et al.
        The 2011 model of the clinical practice of emergency medicine.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19: e19-e40
        View in Article
        • American Board of Emergency Medicine
        Diplomates to Participate in the Development of Initial Certification.
        ABEM Memo. 2010; Vol 12 (https://www.abem.org/public/docs/default-source/publication-documents/2010-spring-newsletter.pdf?sfvrsn=6. Available at: Accessed on June 15th, 2014)
        View in Article

      9. Steele MT. Report at the American Academy of Emergency Medicine Scientific Assembly. American Board of Emergency Medicine Reports at National Meetings. Available at: https://www.abem.org/public/docs/default-source/publication-documents/aaem-2011-final56E286AC8033.pdf. October 10, 2011. Accessed June 15, 2014.

        View in Article

      10. American Board of Emergency Medicine. Annual Report, 2011-2012. Available at: https://www.abem.org/public/docs/default-source/publication-documents/2010-11-annual-report.pdf. July 27, 2012. Accessed June 15, 2014.

        View in Article

      11. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and The American Board of Emergency Medicine. The emergency medicine milestone project. American Board of Emergency Medicine Emergency Medicine Milestones website. Available at: https://www.abem.org/public/docs/default-source/migrated-documents-and-files/em-milestones.pdf?sfvrsn=4. October 22, 2012. Accessed June 15, 2014.

        View in Article
        • Davis D.A.
        • Mazmanian P.E.
        • Fordis M.
        • Van Harrison R.
        • Thorpe K.E.
        • Perrier L.
        Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review.
        JAMA. 2006; 296: 1094-1102
        View in Article
        • Claridge J.A.
        • Calland J.F.
        • Chandrasekhara V.
        • Young J.S.
        • Sanfey H.
        • Schirmer B.D.
        Comparing resident measurements to attending surgeon self-perceptions of surgical educators.
        Am J Surg. 2003; 185: 323-327
        View in Article
        • Fernandez A.
        • Schillinger D.
        • Grumbach K.
        • et al.
        Physician language ability and cultural competence. An exploratory study of communication with Spanish-speaking patients.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19: 167-174
        View in Article
        • Hoppe R.B.
        • Farquhar L.J.
        • Henry R.
        • Stoffelmayr B.
        Residents' attitudes towards and skills in counseling: using undetected standardized patients.
        J Gen Intern Med. 1990; 5: 415-420
        View in Article
        • Ireton H.R.
        • Sherman M.
        Self-ratings of graduating family practice residents' psychological medicine abilities.
        Fam Pract Res J. 1988; 7: 236-244
        View in Article
        • Johnson D.
        • Cujec B.
        Comparison of self, nurse, and physician assessment of residents rotating through an intensive care unit.
        Crit Care Med. 1998; 26: 1811-1816
        View in Article
        • Paradise J.E.
        • Finkel M.A.
        • Beiser A.S.
        • Berenson A.B.
        • Greenberg D.B.
        • Winter M.R.
        Assessments of girl's genital findings and the likelihood of sexual abuse: agreement among physicians self-rated as skilled.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997; 151: 883-891
        View in Article
        • Robbins J.M.
        • Kirmayer L.J.
        • Cathébras P.
        • Yaffe M.J.
        • Dworkind M.
        Physician characteristics and the recognition of depression and anxiety in primary care.
        Med Care. 1994; 32: 795-812
        View in Article

      Article info

      Publication history

      Published online: July 07, 2014
      Accepted: April 28, 2014
      Received in revised form: January 30, 2014
      Received: October 2, 2013

      Footnotes

      This study was exempt from our hospital's Institutional Review Board.

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.04.032

      Copyright

      © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX