Letter to the Editor| Volume 48, ISSUE 4, P473, April 2015

Download started.


Reply: Shah Kwong Newman Response to Xue

Published:February 06, 2015DOI:
      We would like to thank Dr. Fu-Shan Xue and his colleagues for their interest in our study on the use of the gum elastic bougie (GEB) for endotracheal intubation. We appreciate the thoughtful and insightful comments written in the letter and we can certainly address a few of their concerns and queries.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      Linked Article

      • Use of the Gum Elastic Bougie During Endotracheal Intubation in Emergent Patients with Difficult Airways
        Journal of Emergency MedicineVol. 48Issue 4
        • Preview
          In the interesting article by Shah et al. that determined the success rate of endotracheal intubation using a gum elastic bougie (GEB) in the emergency department, the authors found that the GEB had a success rate of 73.7% when utilized as a rescue airway in patients with difficult airways, and the characteristics of “palpable clicks” and “hold-up” were unreliable (1). There are several aspects of the methods and results of this study that should be clarified and discussed.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF