Selected Topics: Sports Medicine| Volume 53, ISSUE 3, P353-368, September 2017

Download started.


Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Decision Rules to Exclude Fractures in Acute Ankle Injuries: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis



      Ankle decision rules are developed to expedite patient care and reduce the number of radiographs of the ankle and foot. Currently, only three systematic reviews have been conducted on the accuracy of the Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules (OAFR) in adults and children. However, no systematic review has been performed to determine the most accurate ankle decision rule.


      The purpose of this study is to examine which clinical decision rules are the most accurate for excluding ankle fracture after acute ankle trauma.


      A systematic search was conducted in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro, ScienceDirect, and EMBASE. The sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio of the included studies were calculated. A meta-analysis was conducted if the accuracy of a decision rule was available from at least three different experimental studies.


      Eighteen studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. These included six ankle decision rules, specifically, the Ottawa Ankle Rules, Tuning Fork Test, Low Risk Ankle Rule, Malleolar and Midfoot Zone Algorithms, and the Bernese Ankle Rules. Meta-analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR), OAFR, Bernese Ankle Rules, and the Malleolar Zone Algorithm resulted in a negative likelihood ratio of 0.12, 0.14, 0.39, and 0.23, respectively.


      The OAR and OAFR are the most accurate decision rules for excluding fractures in the event of an acute ankle injury.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Doherty C.
        • Delahunt E.
        • Caulfield B.
        • Hertel J.
        • Ryan J.
        • Bleakley C.
        The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies.
        Sports Med. 2014; 44: 123-140
        • Lau L.H.
        • Kerr D.
        • Law I.
        • Ritchie P.
        Nurse practitioners treating ankle and foot injuries using the Ottawa Ankle Rules: a comparative study in the emergency department.
        Australas Emerg Nur J. 2013; 16: 110-115
        • Bachmann L.
        • Kolb E.
        • Koller M.T.
        • Steurer J.
        • ter Riet G.
        Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot: a systematic review.
        BMJ. 2003; 326: 417
        • Stiell I.G.
        • Greenberg G.H.
        • McKnight R.D.
        • Nair R.C.
        • McDowell I.
        • Worthington J.R.
        A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1992; 21: 384-390
        • Eggli S.
        • Sclabas G.M.
        • Eggli S.
        • Zimmermann H.
        • Exadaktylos A.K.
        The Bernese Ankle Rules: a fast, reliable test after low-energy, supination-type malleolar and midfoot trauma.
        J Trauma. 2005; 59: 1268-1271
        • Dissmann P.D.
        • Han K.H.
        The tuning fork test – a useful tool for improving specificity in “Ottawa positive” patients after ankle inversion injury.
        Emerg Med J. 2006; 23: 788-790
        • Dayan P.S.
        • Vitale M.
        • Langsam D.J.
        • et al.
        Derivation of clinical prediction rules to identify children with fractures after twisting injuries of the ankle.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 736-743
        • Boutis K.
        • Komar L.
        • Jaramillo D.
        • et al.
        Sensitivity of a clinical examination to predict the need for radiography in children with ankle injuries: a prospective study.
        Lancet. 2001; 358: 2118-2121
        • Jaeschke R.
        • Guyat G.H.
        • Sacket D.L.
        • Evidence Based Medicine Working Group
        Users' guides to the medical literature, III: how to use an article about a diagnostic test. B: What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients?.
        JAMA. 1994; 271: 703-707
        • Pereira Bde B.
        • Pereira CAde B.
        A likelihood approach to diagnostic tests in clinical medicine.
        Revstat Stat J. 2005; 3: 77-98
        • Dowling S.
        • Spooner C.H.
        • Liang Y.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot in children: a meta-analysis.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 277-287
        • Gravel J.
        • Hedrei P.
        • Grimard G.
        • Gouin S.
        Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 54: 534-540.e1
        • Boutis K.
        • Grootendorst P.
        • Willan A.
        • et al.
        Effect of the Low Risk Ankle Rule on the frequency of radiography in children with ankle injuries.
        CMAJ. 2013; 185: E731-E738
        • Myers A.
        • Canty K.
        • Nelson T.
        Are the Ottawa Ankle Rules helpful in ruling out the need for x ray examination in children?.
        Arch Dis Child. 2005; 90: 1309-1311
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        • The PRISMA Group
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis: the PRISMA statement.
        BMJ. 2009; 339: b2535
        • Beynon R.
        • Leeflang M.M.
        • McDonald S.
        • et al.
        Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; : MR000022
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Bruns D.E.
        • et al.
        Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
        Clin Chem. 2003; 49: 1-6
        • Whiting P.F.
        • Rutjes A.W.
        • Westwood M.E.
        • et al.
        QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
        Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155: 529-536
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Rutjes A.W.S.
        • Whiting P.
        • Vlassov V.V.
        • Leeflang M.M.G.
        • Deeks J.J.
        Assessing methodological quality.
        in: Deeks J.J. Bossuyt P.M. Gatsonis C. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 1.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, London2009 (Available at:)
        • Casella G.
        • Berger R.L.
        Statistical inference.
        2nd edn. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA2002
        • Viechtbauer W.
        Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
        Stat Med. 2007; 26: 37-52
        • Doebler P.
        mada: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.
        2015 (Available at:) (Accessed January 7, 2015)
        • Gatsonis C.
        • Paliwal P.
        Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187: 271-281
        • Kose O.
        • Gokhan S.
        • Ozhasenekler A.
        • Celiktas M.
        • Yigit S.
        • Gurcan S.
        Comparison of Ottawa Ankle Rules and Bernese Ankle Rules in acute ankle and midfoot injuries.
        Turk J Emerg Med. 2010; 10: 101-105
        • Beceren G.N.
        • Yolcu S.
        • Tomruk O.
        • Atay T.
        • Baykal Y.B.
        Ottawa versus Bernese: which is better?.
        Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013; 39: 147-150
        • Derksen R.J.
        • Knijnenberg L.M.
        • Fransen G.
        • Breederveld R.S.
        • Heymans M.W.
        • Schipper I.B.
        Diagnostic performance of the Bernese versus Ottawa ankle rules: results of a randomized controlled trial.
        Injury. 2015; 46: 1645-1649
        • Smith K.R.
        • Brown C.K.
        • Brewer K.L.
        Can clinical prediction rules used in acute pediatric ankle and midfoot injuries be applied to an adult population?.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2011; 29: 441-445
        • Yazdani S.
        • Jahandideh H.
        • Ghofrani H.
        Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Iran: a prospective survey.
        BMC Emerg Med. 2006; 6: 3
        • Leisey J.
        Prospective validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a deployed military population.
        Mil Med. 2004; 169: 804-806
        • Fiesseler F.
        • Szucs P.
        • Kec R.
        • Richman P.B.
        Can nurses appropriately interpret the Ottawa Ankle Rule?.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2004; 22: 145-148
        • Derksen R.J.
        • Bakker F.C.
        • Geervliet P.C.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility in the interpretation of Ottawa ankle and foot rules by specialized emergency nurses.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2005; 23: 725-729
        • Knudsen R.
        • Vijdea R.
        • Damborg F.
        Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in a Danish emergency department.
        Dan Med Bull. 2010; 57: A4142
        • Pires R.E.S.
        • Pereira A.A.
        • Abreu-e-silva G.M.
        • et al.
        Ottawa Ankle Rules and Subjective Surgeon Perception to evaluate radiograph necessity following foot and ankle sprain.
        Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014; 4: 432-435
        • Meena S.
        • Gangary S.K.
        Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Indian Scenario.
        Arch Trauma Res. 2015; 4: e20969
        • Can U.
        • Ruckert R.
        • Held U.
        • Buchmann P.
        • Platz A.
        • Bachmann L.M.
        Safety and efficiency of the Ottawa Ankle Rule in a Swiss population with ankle sprains.
        Swiss Med Wkly. 2008; 138: 292-296
        • Wang X.
        • Chang S.M.
        • Yu G.R.
        • Rao Z.T.
        Clinical value of the Ottawa ankle rules for diagnosis of fractures in acute ankle injuries.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e63228
        • Stiell I.G.
        • McKnight R.D.
        • Greenberg G.H.
        • et al.
        Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
        JAMA. 1994; 271: 827-832
        • Menge T.J.
        • Looney C.G.
        Medial malleolar stress fracture in an adolescent athlete.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 54: 242-246