Abstract
Background
The management of patients with impaled unexploded devices is rare in the civilian
setting. However, as the lines of the traditional battlefield are blurred by modern
warfare and terrorist activity, emergency providers should be familiar with facility
protocols, plans, and contact information of their local resources for unexploded
devices.
Case Report
A 44-year-old male sustained a close-proximity blast injury to his lower extremities
while manipulating a mortar-type firework. He presented to the regional trauma center
with an open, comminuted distal femur fracture and radiographic evidence of a potential
explosive device in his thigh. His management was coordinated with the local Explosive
Ordinance Disposal and the fire department.
Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This?
Explosive devices pose a grave threat when encountered. Familiarization with protocols
to manage these patients can mitigate disaster. Emergency providers should expect
and be prepared to coordinate care for these patients.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Emergency MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Unexploded ordnance in an expectant patient: a case report.Mil Med. 2016; 181: 302-305
- Unexploded ordnance (UXO).Jt Trauma Syst Clin Pract Guidel. 2009; 44: 174-180
- Removal of unexploded ordnance from patients: a 50-year military experience and current recommendations.Mil Med. 1999; 164: 163-165
- Subpart M—military munitions.Code Fed Regul. 2016; 40: 48-52
- Improvised explosive devices: pathophysiology, injury profiles and current medical management.J R Army Med Corps. 2009; : 265-272
- The radiographic analysis of a wounded patient questioned of having retained unexploded ordinance.Emerg Radiol. 2016; 23: 521-525
- Weapons effects and war wounds.(Available at:)http://www.cs.amedd.army.mil/FileDownloadpublic.aspx?docid=85ed6078-cd5c-4821-a6ee-9040857355c2Date accessed: April 27, 2017
- War Surgery in Afghanistan and Iraq: a Series Of Cases, 2003–2007.Office of the Surgeon General, United States Army, Falls Church, VA2008: 373-376
- Phosphorus explosions.Process Saf Environ Prot. 2017; 107: 87-93
- Stratification of risk to the surgical team in removal of small arms ammunition implanted in the craniofacial region: case report.J Neurosurg. 2016; 125: 661-666
- Safety of imaging exploding bullets with ultrasound.Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 28: 183-187
- Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging.Heart. 2008; 94: 943-948
Article info
Publication history
Published online: January 22, 2018
Accepted:
December 1,
2017
Received in revised form:
November 5,
2017
Received:
August 17,
2017
Identification
Copyright
© 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.