Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine| Volume 58, ISSUE 4, P636-646, April 2020

Emergency Ultrasound Literature and Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Criteria

Published:November 07, 2019DOI:



      Given the wide usage of emergency point-of-care ultrasound (EUS) among emergency physicians (EPs), rigorous study surrounding its accuracy is essential. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) criteria were established to ensure robust reporting methodology for diagnostic studies. Adherence to the STARD criteria among EUS diagnostic studies has yet to be reported.


      Our objective was to evaluate a body of EUS literature shortly after STARD publication for its baseline adherence to the STARD criteria.


      EUS studies in 5 emergency medicine journals from 2005–2010 were evaluated for their adherence to the STARD criteria. Manuscripts were selected for inclusion if they reported original research and described the use of 1 of 10 diagnostic ultrasound modalities designated as “core emergency ultrasound applications” in the 2008 American College of Emergency Physicians Ultrasound Guidelines. Literature search identified 307 studies; of these, 45 met inclusion criteria for review.


      The median STARD score was 15 (interquartile range [IQR] 12–17), representing 60% of the 25 total STARD criteria. The median STARD score among articles that reported diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher than those that did not report accuracy (17 [IQR 15–19] vs. 11 [IQR 9–13], respectively; p < 0.0001). Seventy-one percent of articles met ≥50% of the STARD criteria (56–84%) and 4% met >80% of the STARD criteria.


      Significant opportunities exist to improve methodological reporting of EUS research. Increased adherence to the STARD criteria among diagnostic EUS studies will improve reporting and improve our ability to compare outcomes.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Lijmer J.G.
        Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.
        JAMA. 1999; 282: 1061
        • Mower W.R.
        Evaluating bias and variability in diagnostic test reports.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 33: 85-91
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Bruns D.E.
        • et al.
        The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.
        Clin Chem. 2003; 49: 7-18
      1. Policy statement: emergency ultrasound guidelines.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 53: 550-570
        • Reid M.C.
        • Lachs M.S.
        • Feinstein A.R.
        Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.
        JAMA. 1995; 274: 645-651
        • Coppus S.
        • Vanderveen F.
        • Bossuyt P.
        • Mol B.
        Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
        Fertil Steril. 2006; 86: 1321-1329
        • Michelessi M.
        • Lucenteforte E.
        • Miele A.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: an application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015.
        PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0189716
        • Roposch A.
        • Moreau N.M.
        • Uleryk E.
        • Doria A.S.
        Developmental dysplasia of the hip: quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy for US.
        Radiology. 2006; 241: 854-860
        • Siddiqui M.A.R.
        The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89: 261-265
        • Smidt N.
        • Rutjes A.W.S.
        • van der Windt D.A.W.M.
        • et al.
        Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
        Radiology. 2005; 235: 347-353
        • Selman T.J.
        • Khan K.S.
        • Mann C.H.
        An evidence-based approach to test accuracy studies in gynecologic oncology: the ‘STARD’ checklist.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 96: 575-578
        • Selman T.J.
        • Morris R.K.
        • Zamora J.
        • Khan K.S.
        The quality of reporting of primary test accuracy studies in obstetrics and gynaecology: application of the STARD criteria.
        BMC Womens Health. 2011; 11: 8
        • Gallo L.
        • Hua N.
        • Mercuri M.
        • Silveira A.
        • Worster A.
        Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine (BEEM; Adherence to standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy in emergency medicine research.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2017; 24: 914-919
        • Stengel D.
        • Bauwens K.
        • Rademacher G.
        • Mutze S.
        • Ekkernkamp A.
        Association between compliance with methodological standards of diagnostic research and reported test accuracy: meta-analysis of focused assessment of US for trauma.
        Radiology. 2005; 236: 102-111
        • Korevaar D.A.
        • Wang J.
        • van Enst W.A.
        • et al.
        Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD.
        Radiology. 2015; 274: 781-789
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Bruns D.E.
        • et al.
        STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.
        BMJ. 2015; 351: h5527