Advertisement

Self-Check-In Kiosks Utilization and Their Association With Wait Times in Emergency Departments in the United States

      Abstract

      Background

      Delayed care in emergency departments (EDs) is a serious problem in the United States. Patient wait time is considered a critical measure of delayed care in EDs. Several strategies have been employed by EDs to reduce wait time, including implementation of self-check-in kiosks. However, the effect of kiosks on wait time in EDs is understudied.

      Objectives

      To assess the association between patient wait time and utilization of self-check-in kiosks in EDs. To investigate a series of other patient-, ED-, and hospital-level predictors of wait time in EDs.

      Methods

      Using data from the 2015 and 2016 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, we analyzed 40,528 ED visits by constructing a multivariable linear regression model of the log-transformed wait time data as an outcome, then computing percent changes in wait times.

      Results

      During the study period, about 9% of EDs in the United States implemented kiosks. In our linear regression model, the wait time in EDs with kiosk self-check-in services was 56.8% shorter (95% confidence interval ̶ 130% to ̶ 6.4%, p < 0.05) compared with EDs without kiosk services. In addition to kiosks, patients' day of visit, arrival time, triage assessment, arrival by ambulance, chronic medical conditions, ED boarding, hospitals' full-capacity protocol, and hospitals’ location were significant predictors of wait time.

      Conclusions

      Self-check-in kiosks are associated with shorter ED wait time in the United States. However, prolonged ED wait time continues to be a system-wide problem, and warrants multilayered interventions to address this challenge for those who are in acute need of immediate care.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hing E.
        • Bhuiya F.A.
        Wait time for treatment in hospital emergency departments.
        (Citeseer 2012. Available at:)
        https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db102.pdf
        Date: 2009
        Date accessed: April 10, 2019
        • Horwitz L.I.
        • Green J.
        • Bradley E.H.
        US emergency department performance on wait time and length of visit.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 55: 133-141
        • Sonnenfeld N.
        • Pitts S.R.
        • Schappert S.M.
        • Decker S.L.
        Emergency department volume and racial and ethnic differences in waiting times in the United States.
        Med Care. 2012; 50: 335-341
        • Trzeciak S.
        • Rivers E.P.
        Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat to patient safety and public health.
        Emerg Med J. 2003; 20: 402-405
        • Ben-Assuli O.
        Electronic health records, adoption, quality of care, legal and privacy issues and their implementation in emergency departments.
        Health Policy. 2015; 119: 287-297
        • James C.A.
        • Bourgeois F.T.
        • Shannon M.W.
        Association of race/ethnicity with emergency department wait times.
        Pediatrics. 2005; 115: e310-e315
        • Bernstein S.L.
        • Aronsky D.
        • Duseja R.
        • et al.
        The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 1-10
        • Sun B.C.
        • Adams J.
        • Orav E.J.
        • et al.
        Determinants of patient satisfaction and willingness to return with emergency care.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 35: 426-434
        • Wheeler E.
        • Hardie T.
        • Klemm P.
        • et al.
        Level of pain and waiting time in the emergency department.
        Pain Manag Nurs. 2010; 11: 108-114
        • Plunkett P.K.
        • Byrne D.G.
        • Breslin T.
        • et al.
        Increasing wait times predict increasing mortality for emergency medical admissions.
        Eur J Emerg Med. 2011; 18: 192-196
        • Handel D.
        • Epstein S.
        • Khare R.
        • et al.
        Interventions to improve the timeliness of emergency care.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18: 1295-1302
        • Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America
        Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.
        National Academies Press (US), Washington, DC2001 (Available at:)
        • Asaro P.V.
        • Lewis L.M.
        • Boxerman S.B.
        Emergency department overcrowding: analysis of the factors of renege rate.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14: 157-162
        • McCarthy M.L.
        • Zeger S.L.
        • Ding R.
        • et al.
        Crowding delays treatment and lengthens emergency department length of stay, even among high-acuity patients.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 54: 492-503
        • Paul S.A.
        • Reddy M.C.
        • DeFlitch C.J.
        A systematic review of simulation studies investigating emergency department overcrowding.
        Simulation. 2010; 86: 559-571
        • O’Neill Hayes T.
        PRIMER: examining trends in emergency department utilization and costs.
        2018: 17 (Available at:)
        • Powell M.P.
        • Yu X.
        • Isehunwa O.
        • Chang C.F.
        National trends in hospital emergency department visits among those with and without multiple chronic conditions, 2007–2012.
        Hosp Top. 2018; 96: 1-8
        • Woodworth L.
        The doctor will be with you… shortly? The effect of insurance coverage on ED wait time.
        J Regul Econ. 2014; 45: 138-174
        • Powell M.P.
        • Yu X.
        • Isehunwa O.
        • Chang C.F.
        Trends in urgency of emergency department visits among those with and without multiple chronic conditions, 2007–2012.
        J Hosp Med Manag. 2016; 2: 2
        • Klein E.Y.
        • Levin S.
        • Toerper M.F.
        • et al.
        The effect of Medicaid expansion on utilization in Maryland emergency departments.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 70: 607-614
        • American College of Emergency Physicians
        ER visits continue to rise since implementation of Affordable Care Act.
        (Available at:)
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
        Emergency department visits.
        (Available at:)
        https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/emergency-department.htm
        Date: 2017
        Date accessed: August 5, 2018
        • Gindi R.M.
        • Black L.I.
        • Cohen R.A.
        Reasons for emergency room use among U.S. adults aged 18-64: National Health Interview Survey, 2013 and 2014.
        Natl Health Stat Rep. 2016; : 1-16
        • Derlet R.W.
        • Richards J.R.
        Overcrowding in the nation’s emergency departments: complex causes and disturbing effects.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 35: 63-68
        • Institute of Medicine Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the US Health System
        Hospital-based emergency care: at the breaking point.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2006 (Available at:)
        • Haukoos J.S.
        • Hopkins E.
        • Bender B.
        • et al.
        Use of kiosks and patient understanding of opt-out and opt-in consent for routine rapid human immunodeficiency virus screening in the emergency department.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19: 287-293
        • Wiler J.L.
        • Gentle C.
        • Halfpenny J.M.
        • et al.
        Optimizing emergency department front-end operations.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 55: 142-160
        • Rhoads J.
        • Drazen E.
        Touchscreen check-in: kiosks speed hospital registration.
        California HealthCare Foundation, Oakland, CA2009 (Available at:)
        • Porter S.C.
        • Cai Z.
        • Gribbons W.
        • et al.
        The asthma kiosk: a patient-centered technology for collaborative decision support in the emergency department.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11: 458-467
        • Gielen A.C.
        • McKenzie L.B.
        • McDonald E.M.
        • et al.
        Using a computer kiosk to promote child safety: results of a randomized, controlled trial in an urban pediatric emergency department.
        Pediatrics. 2007; 120: 330-339
        • Houry D.
        • Kaslow N.J.
        • Kemball R.S.
        • et al.
        Does screening in the emergency department hurt or help victims of intimate partner violence?.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 51: 433-442
        • Hsieh Y.-H.
        • Holtgrave D.R.
        • Peterson S.
        • et al.
        Novel emergency department registration kiosk for HIV screening is cost-effective.
        AIDS Care. 2016; 28: 483-486
        • Sinha M.
        • Khor K.-N.
        • Amresh A.
        • et al.
        The use of a kiosk-model bilingual self-triage system in the pediatric emergency department.
        Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014; 30: 63-68
        • Orlando M.S.
        • Rothman R.E.
        • Woodfield A.
        • et al.
        Public health information delivery in the emergency department: analysis of a kiosk-based program.
        J Emerg Med. 2016; 50: 223-227
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
        About the Ambulatory Health Care Surveys.
        (Available at:)
        https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/about_ahcd.htm
        Date: 2017
        Date accessed: April 14, 2018
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Center for Health Statistics
        Ambulatory health care data: questionnaires, datasets, and related documentation.
        (Available at:)
        https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/ahcd_questionnaires.htm
        Date: 2017
        Date accessed: April 11, 2019
        • McCaig L.F.
        • Burt C.W.
        Understanding and interpreting the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: key questions and answers.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 60: 716-721
        • Boger E.
        Electronic tracking board reduces ED patient length of stay at Indiana Hospital.
        J Emerg Nurs. 2003; 29: 39-43
        • Considine J.
        • Lucas E.
        • Martin R.
        • et al.
        Rapid intervention and treatment zone: redesigning nursing services to meet increasing emergency department demand.
        Int J Nurs Pract. 2012; 18: 60-67
        • Dobson I.
        • Doan Q.
        • Hung G.
        A systematic review of patient tracking systems for use in the pediatric emergency department.
        J Emerg Med. 2013; 44: 242-248
        • Miake-Lye I.M.
        • O’Neill S.M.
        • Childers C.P.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of interventions to improve emergency department efficiency: an evidence map.
        (Available at:)
        https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513772/
        Date: 2017
        Date accessed: April 11, 2019
        • Morley C.
        • Unwin M.
        • Peterson G.M.
        • et al.
        Emergency department crowding: a systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions.
        PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0203316
        • Pines J.M.
        Emergency care at the crossroads: emergency department crowding, payment reform, and one potential future.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 66: 493-495
        • Salway R.J.
        • Valenzuela R.
        • Shoenberger J.M.
        • et al.
        Emergency department (ED) overcrowding: evidence-based answers to frequently asked questions.
        Rev Médica Clínica Las Condes. 2017; 28: 213-219
        • Hing E.
        • Gousen S.
        • Shimizu I.
        • Burt C.
        Guide to using masked design variables to estimate standard errors in public use files of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.
        Inq J Health Care Organ Provis Financ. 2003; 40: 401-415
        • SAS Institute Inc
        SAS/STAT® 14.3 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
        (Available at:)
        • Scott A.
        Rao-Scott corrections and their impact.
        in: Proceedings of the 2007 joint statistical meetings. Salt Lake City, Utah. 2007
        • Warner L.S.H.
        • Pines J.M.
        • Chambers J.G.
        • Schuur J.D.
        The most crowded US hospital emergency departments did not adopt effective interventions to improve flow, 2007–10.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2015; 34: 2151-2159
        • Schlessinger M.
        Improving patient flow: design and technology upgrades for emergency departments.
        Health Facil Manage. 2018; 31: 32-36
        • Asplin B.R.
        • Flottemesch T.J.
        • Gordon B.D.
        Developing models for patient flow and daily surge capacity research.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 1109-1113
        • Hertzum M.
        Patterns in emergency-department arrivals and length of stay: input for visualizations of crowding.
        Ergon Open J. 2016; 9: 1-14
        • Freund Y.
        • Vincent-Cassy C.
        • Bloom B.
        • et al.
        Association between age older than 75 years and exceeded target waiting times in the emergency department: a multicenter cross-sectional survey in the Paris metropolitan area, France.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2013; 62: 449-456
        • Horwitz L.I.
        • Bradley E.H.
        Percentage of US emergency department patients seen within the recommended triage time: 1997 to 2006.
        Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 1857-1865
        • Buttorff C.
        • Ruder T.
        • Bauman M.
        Multiple chronic conditions in the United States.
        RAND Corp, St Monica, CA2017 (Available at:)
        • McClelland M.S.
        • Lazar D.
        • Sears V.
        • et al.
        The past, present, and future of urgent matters: lessons learned from a decade of emergency department flow improvement.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18: 1392-1399
        • Derlet R.W.
        • Richards J.R.
        • Kravitz R.L.
        Frequent overcrowding in US emergency departments.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8: 151-155
        • Welch S.J.
        • Augustine J.J.
        • Dong L.
        • et al.
        Volume-related differences in emergency department performance.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012; 38: 395-402
        • Joshi A.
        • Trout K.
        The role of health information kiosks in diverse settings: a systematic review.
        Health Inf Libr J. 2014; 31: 254-273