A Tale of Two D-Dimers: Comparison of Two Assay Methods to Evaluate Deep Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism



      D-dimer testing rules out deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in low-risk emergency department (ED) patients. Most research has measured fibrin-equivalent units (FEUs), however, many laboratories measure D-dimer units (DDUs).


      Our aim was to determine whether either DDU measurements or FEU measurements can rule out DVT/PE using traditional or age-related cutoff values.


      We performed a de-identified multicenter retrospective evaluation of D-dimer in nonpregnant adult ED patients to evaluate for DVT/PE. DDUs were multiplied by 2 to determine equivalent FEUs prior to analysis. Sensitivity measurements for D-dimer were calculated for FEUs, DDUs, combined FEU/DDUs, and multiple age-adjusted values.


      We identified 47,088 ED patients with a D-dimer laboratory value (27,307 FEUs/19,781 DDUs) and 1623 DVT/PEs. The median combined FEU/DDU D-dimer was 400 ng/mL FEUs (interquartile range [IQR] 300–900 ng/mL FEUs) for patients without a DVT/PE vs 2530 ng/mL FEU (IQR 1094–6000 ng/mL FEUs) with a DVT/PE (p < 0.001), overall sensitivity of 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.0–87.6%) and negative predictive value of 99.3% (95% CI 99.2–99.4%). Individually, FEUs performed better than DDUs, with sensitivities of 88.0% (95% CI 85.8–89.9%) and 86.1% (95% CI 83.1–88.7%), respectively; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Combined age-adjusted performance had a sensitivity of 90.3% (95% CI 88.3–92.0%); however, a new DDU-only age-adjusted criteria had the highest sensitivity of 91.1% (95% CI 87.9–93.6%).


      Our undifferentiated D-dimer measurements had a slightly lower sensitivity to rule out DVT/PE than reported previously. Our data support using either DDU or FEU measurements for all ages or when using various age-adjusted criteria to rule out DVT/PE.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Chwan Ng AC
        • Chung T
        • Yong ASC
        • Wong HSP
        • Celermajer DS
        • Kritharides L
        Long-term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality of 1023 patients with confirmed acute pulmonary embolism.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011; 4: 122-128
        • Riley RS
        • Gilbert AR
        • Dalton JB
        • Pai S
        • McPherson RA.
        Widely used types and clinical applications of D-dimer assay.
        Lab Med. 2016; 47: 90-102
        • Klok FA
        • Mos ICM
        • Nijkeuter M
        • et al.
        Simplification of the Revised Geneva Score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
        Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168: 2131-2136
        • Freund Y
        • Rousseau A
        • Guyot-Rousseau F
        • et al.
        PERC rule to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in emergency low-risk patients: study protocol for the PROPER randomized controlled study.
        Trials. 2015; 16: 1-8
        • Kline JA
        • Courtney DM
        • Kabrhel C
        • et al.
        Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria.
        J Thromb Haemost. 2008; 6: 772-780
        • Pollack CV
        • Schreiber D
        • Goldhaber SZ
        • et al.
        Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: initial report of EMPEROR (Multicenter Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry).
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57: 700-706
        • Perrier A
        • Desmarais S
        • Goehring C
        • et al.
        D-dimer testing for suspected pulmonary embolism in outpatients.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997; 156: 492-496
        • Favresse J
        • Lippi G
        • Roy PM
        • et al.
        D-dimer: preanalytical, analytical, postanalytical variables, and clinical applications.
        Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018; 55: 548-577
        • Van Es N
        • Van Der Hulle T
        • Van Es J
        • et al.
        Wells rule and D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism a systematic review and individual-patient data meta–analysis.
        Ann Intern Med. 2016; 165: 253-261
        • Linkins LA
        • Takach Lapner S
        Review of D-dimer testing: good, bad, and ugly.
        Int J Lab Hematol. 2017; 39: 98-103
        • Kline JA
        • Mitchell AM
        • Kabrhel C
        • Richman PB
        • Courtney DM.
        Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
        J Thromb Haemost. 2004; 2: 1247-1255
        • Olson JD
        • Cunningham MT
        • Higgins RA
        • Eby CS
        • Brandt JT.
        D-dimer: sSimple test, tough problems.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013; 137: 1030-1038
        • McLenachan CJ
        • Chua O
        • Chan BSH
        • et al.
        Comparison of Wells and YEARS clinical decision rules with D-dimer for low-risk pulmonary embolus patients.
        Intern Med J. 2019; 49: 739-744
        • Parks C
        • Bounds R
        • Davis B
        • Caplan R
        • Laughery T
        • Zeserson E.
        Investigation of age-adjusted D-dimer using an uncommon assay.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2019; 37: 1285-1288
        • Wolf SJ
        • Hahn SA
        • Nentwich LM
        • et al.
        Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute venous thromboembolic disease.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2018; 71: e59-e109
        • Schrecengost JE
        • LeGallo RD
        • Boyd JC
        • et al.
        Comparison of diagnostic accuracies in outpatients and hospitalized patients of D-dimer testing for the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism.
        Clin Chem. 2003; 49: 1483-1490
        • Konstantinides SV
        • Meyer G
        • Becattini C
        • et al.
        2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS).
        Eur Heart J. 2020; 41: 543-603
        • Romero A
        • Alonso C
        • Rincón M
        • et al.
        Risk of venous thromboembolic disease in women a qualitative systematic review.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005; 121: 8-17
        • Moores L
        • Bilello KL
        • Murin S.
        Sex and gender issues and venous thromboembolism.
        Clin Chest Med. 2004; 25: 281-297
        • Bauersachs RM
        • Riess H
        • Hach-Wunderle V
        • et al.
        Impact of gender on the clinical presentation and diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis.
        Thromb Haemost. 2010; 103: 710-717
        • Andreou ER
        • Koru-Sengul T
        • Linkins L
        • Bates SM
        • Ginsberg JS
        • Kearon C.
        Differences in clinical presentation of deep vein thrombosis in men and women.
        J Thromb Haemost. 2008; 6: 1713-1719
        • Gurram M
        • Pulivarthi S.
        Effectiveness of D-dimer as a screening test for venous thromboembolism: an update.
        N Am J Med Sci. 2014; 6: 491-499